Category: Health Freedom

  • Sen. Dick Durbin Is Attacking Your Freedom Again

    It appears that Senator Dick Durbin simply will not be satisfied until he has destroyed your freedom to have the vitamins and other dietary supplements of your choice. He has a long history of proposing laws that would give the FDA sweeping new powers based on vague language, and his latest proposal is more of the same.

    This bill MUST be stopped.

    Here is more information from The Alliance For Natural Health – the original article can be found here.

    Sen. Durbin’s disingenuous “Dietary Supplement Labeling Act,” which we told you about last week, needs to be defeated. Please contact your senators!

    The bill, S.1310, is finally available for viewing by the American public. It exploits the Lazy Cakes incident, where a rogue food company decided to put melatonin into brownies and allowed them to be sold to children. But that case was about the illegal actions of a food manufacturer, whereas this bill is simply another attempt to limit your access to dietary supplements.

    The proposed law trusts the FDA and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to decide what levels and combinations of dietary ingredients are considered safe and what aren’t. Given the FDA’s profound bias against supplements, and the skewed, anti-science recommendations of the IOM’s recent vitamin D report, these are hardly trustworthy sources of guidance!

    If the bill is passed, neither the FDA nor the IOM will even be subject to any clear standards. They can just make it all up as they go along. Their judgments can be completely arbitrary.

    The whole thrust of British and American constitutional history is telling the government it can’t just do anything it likes. There must be written standards and rules encoded in law. The government must follow those standards and rules like anyone else. It can’t just be arbitrary.

    Durbin’s bill in other sections just reinvents the wheel, authorizing the FDA to do what it is already authorized to do, but with vague new language that could prove troublesome later. This isn’t needed. The FDA is fully empowered to enforce the many laws and regulations which already exist—provided by DSHEA, the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act, the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act, and Good Manufacturing Practices guidelines.

    Sen. Durbin’s bill needs to be defeated. Period. That said, it’s a bill that modifies the procedures set forth by DSHEA, the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994. And any bill that modifies the procedures set up by DSHEA should have at least two elements that are not in Durbin’s bill. It must:

    • uphold the right to free speech about the science and health benefits of dietary supplements, and
    • create a new agency under Health and Human Services dedicated to overseeing nutritional supplements.

    FDA is supposed to be concerned with food and drugs; supplements are their own category, utterly different from either food or drugs, so they should not fall under the same agency’s administrative power. This is especially important since the FDA is so hostile to supplements and so beholden to drug companies.

    Both the Durbin bill and the dangerous FDA’s proposed NDI guidance (see our new article on NDIs in this issue) seek to give the FDA broad new authority to disapprove supplements or supplement ingredients on totally arbitrary grounds, with no rules or standards. If allowed to stand, over time this will drastically reduce the number of supplements and supplement potencies, raise prices substantially, injure our ability to take care of our health, raise healthcare costs, stifle supplement innovation, and cost millions of jobs in the supplement industry.

    For now, though, the Dietary Supplement Labeling Act needs to be defeated. S.1310 has been referred to the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee for further deliberation. If you have not done so already, please contact your senators and representative to voice your opposition to this bill. Please take a moment to send your message now.


    TO SEND YOUR MESSAGE TO CONGRESS:

    Click THIS LINK to go to the Action Alert page. Once there, fill out the form with your name and address, etc., and customize your letter. We have a suggested message for you, but please feel free to add your own comments to the letter.

  • BioIdentical Hormones, Compounded Drugs Under Attack – Again

    By Nurse Mark

     

    Laws were broken and people were harmed, even killed by a compounding pharmacy in Massachusetts.

    The company, New England Compounding Center (NECC) appears to have gone far beyond what most of us envision when we think of a compounding pharmacy. NECC looks to have had visions of being “Big Pharma” without having to bother with all the troublesome FDA oversight that goes with being a drug manufacturer.

    And so, because laws were broken and people were killed, NECC (meaning the people in charge of NECC) should rightfully “have the book thrown at ’em.” If it is shown that there was negligence on the part of the management of NECC then it would be reasonable for people to be looking at serious prison time since allowing things to happen that cause people to die is known as homicide or even murder.

    Unfortunately, in true knee-jerk fashion, our politicians have become involved.

    A complex bill has been drafted that will vastly increase the power, scope, and intrusiveness of the FDA and will seriously limit your ability to access compounded medicines – things like custom Bio Identical Hormones, custom transdermal patches, and custom time-release formulations.

    This bill, introduced in the 113th Congress as S.959 — the Pharmaceutical Compounding Quality and Accountability Act, gives the FDA, which has been historically biased against supplements and integrative medicine, far too much ability to ban compounded drugs such as thyroid medications and estriol and other hormones.

    This bill is not really new. The FDA has been seeking to expand it’s powers for some time, and they tried to do this in 2008 with the female hormone estriol. Stymied, they did not have the authority to enforce their actions.  S.959 would give the FDA the full authority that they seek, and allow them to ban commonly used Bio Identical Hormone Treatments (BHRT).

    For millions of women it could mean being forced back to using Big Pharma’s one-size-fits-all synthetic hormones – to the delight of the pharmaceutical companies and their shareholders. Sales of Premarin and Prempro have dropped steadily since 2002 when two big government-sponsored studies found that the drugs raised the risks of breast cancer, stroke, and heart attack. Wyeth, the manufacturer of Premarin and Prempro, petitioned the FDA in 2005 to restrict the availability of competing compounded “bio-identical” hormones and similar efforts have been ongoing ever since.

    It is obvious to us here at The Wellness Club that Big Pharma is not going to rest until they have achieved their monopoly of medicine, and that they subscribe to the “Never let a good crisis go to waste” strategy of politics.

    What can you do?

    We have two resources for you where you can quickly and easily send a message to your elected representatives to voice your opinion about this newest power-grab:

    A website called MyMedsMatter has an easy contact form here: http://www.mymedsmatter.com/?vvsrc=%2fCampaigns%2f32492%2fRespond

    And The Alliance For Natural health also has a good article on this important subject and a “Take Action” link where you can contact your representatives. Check it out here: http://www.anh-usa.org/compounding-pharmacy-bill-third-draft-still-some-major-problems%E2%80%94and-no-time-to-lose/

    We urge you to take action along with us to protect your access to compounded medicines and bio identical hormone therapy.

  • My Uncle The Drug Pusher

    Uncle Sam Allows, Even Helps Fuel A New Generation Of Opiate Addicts

     

    By Nurse Mark

     

    While our government wages a ruinous and futile “War On Drugs” and wastes time and resources with an undeclared war on vitamins and natural supplements” and sends armed swat teams to raid the sellers of such dangerous things as raw milk it is turning a blind eye to – and even supporting – the efforts of Big Pharma to turn America into a nation of opiate addicts.

    A recent analysis by The Associated Press paints a disturbing picture of an explosion of prescription drug abuse over the past decade:

    Nationwide, pharmacies received and ultimately dispensed the equivalent of 69 tons of pure oxycodone and 42 tons of pure hydrocodone in 2010, the last year for which statistics are available. That’s enough to give 40 5-mg Percocets and 24 5-mg Vicodins to every person in the United States.

    A group called The Alliance For Natural Health expanded on this AP article bringing some information of their own into the picture – tying together the various financial and other conflicts of interest that exist between the drug companies and our government agencies that are supposedly responsible for our safety and well-being:

    As Marcia Angell, former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, pointed out in her 2004 book The Truth about the Drug Companies, the Pharmaceutical Researchers and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) employs more lobbyists in Washington than there are members of Congress. Since 2007, the group has spent more than $20 million annually on lobbying in Washington to see that its interests are protected.

    The DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency) is supposed to set “quotas” of amounts of drugs that a drug company can manufacture and sell, so that these drugs do not flood the country and end up in the hands of addicts. Former DEA official Gene Haislip says however that DEA won’t block a drug company’s requests for a quota increase “if that company is supporting members of Congress who have the power to block the agency’s funding.”

    It looks like 20 million dollars a year buys a lot of support. A watchdog organization called OpenSecrets.org has compiled research showing how drug company money finds it’s way to Washington. Interestingly, the top two recipients of Big Pharma money in the years 2011/2012 are Barack Obama at $362,879 and Mitt Romney at $263,735.

    The OpenSecrets.org list of top 20 pharmaceutical / health care products recipients can be found here.

    Drug giant Pfizer was the largest “contributor” in 2011 / 2012, lining congressional pockets to the tune of $848,899. They are hardly alone in their largess though – a more complete list of the payoffs can be found here, on the OpenSecrets.org site.

    We have written about the drug-pushing tendencies of our government agencies before – The Drug Pushers in Your Neighborhood is just one of many articles to discuss the cozy relationship between Big Pharma and the FDA and other government regulators – but this latest information regarding the incestuous nature of relations between DEA, Big Pharma, and congress is particularly alarming.

    Is there any doubt that as long as this unrestricted lobbying is allowed to buy congressional favor we will continue to be a nation in trouble?

     

    Sources:

    http://www.anh-usa.org/big-pharma-whistles-and-dea-comes-running/

    http://www.philly.com/philly/health/20120405_ap_painkillersalessoararoundusfueladdiction.html?c=r

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gPwb6NNjRK5X1NR3XKLO4B5PJu6g?docId=3d8960c42a3a430ca5f6437ca964c857

    http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=h04

    http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/recips.php?cycle=2012&ind=h04

  • FDA’s Draft Guidance Threatens Vitamins – Stop The Bully Now!

    The FDA is continuing to behave like a bureaucracy Out-Of-Control

     

    Dear HealthBeat News Readers

     

    The FDA is proposing certain regulations to impede, restrict, and ban dietary supplements. They intend to do this by regulation, not by laws – this is an end-run around Congress.

    Remember, laws are made by Congress – not by bureaucracies!

     

    Your local policeman doesn’t make the laws – he just enforces them – and the FDA is the policeman for foods an drugs. The job of the FDA is to enforce the laws that Congress makes – not to make up laws all on it’s own!

    We have written about this Draft Guidance issue in previous HealthBeat Newsletters: FDA Says: We’re Baaaack! No Vitamin Is Safe! and Dr. Myatt’s Wellness Club Forced Out Of Business? 

    Many of you have already written your representatives: Sen. Durbin Is Still After Your Vitamins – In ‘Stealth-Mode’ and have received encouraging replies from some – but the FDA is taking little notice of the wishes of the House and of Congress, instead choosing to behave like a schoolyard bully – determined to get it’s way no matter what.

    This issue is coming to a head now, with the “Comment Period” set to end on December 2nd. After that time your letters and comments will have all the effect of (as we country-folk say) “spittin’ into the wind.”

    The letter below was received recently by Dr. Myatt from a laboratory service. We encourage our subscribers to read the letter and to follow the advice to make one final push to contact all elected representatives and to object strenuously to this blatant, bullying power-grab by the FDA – the paid lap-dog of the Pharmaceutical industry.

    Sincerely,
    Nurse Mark

     

    Dear PCS Members,

    The FDA has presented a troubling issue regarding nutritional supplements.

    A GUIDANCE issued by the FDA calls for such incredible constraint on the supplement industry that, if enacted, could truly have a profound effect on the availability of a vast array of products.

    Since virtually all of us, including myself, use dietary supplements, I urge you to take immediate action by sending the attached letters to your representatives. A text version is also at the end of this email – you may cut and paste it into an email to your elected representatives in Washington, but you will need to fill out a brief contact form first.  I believe faxing is the best way to be heard. Feel free to change the letters and personalize them.

    Follow this link to a Website for government contact information including mailing addresses and fax numbers for your Senators and Representatives.

    THE DEADLINE IS DECEMBER 2, 2011 FOR COMMENTS – The FDA is proposing certain regulations to impede, restrict, and ban dietary supplements. This has happened in Europe and other countries.  Please help to stop it from happening in America!

    Below is more information if you care to read up on this topic.  We wish to thank Biotics Research Corp. for supplying the letters and information to us and virtually every company and organization attending the Florida Chiropractic Association conference last weekend in Naples, FL.

    Sincerely,
    J. William Beakey, D.O.M.
    Director
    Professional Co-op Services, Inc.
    866-999-4041
    866-999-9175 – fax
    www.professionalco-op.com

    The following are a few highlights of the Guidance document:

    The FDA’s draft Guidance requires companies to possess exorbitant amounts of information concerning their existing dietary supplements to prove that New Dietary Ingredient (NDI) notifications are not required for the products they are currently marketing. In many cases, it will be impossible to gather such information, thereby threatening the future availability of numerous dietary supplement products on the market today.

    In order to market a product that contains a new dietary ingredient, manufacturers will be required to submit a tremendous amount of information concerning historical use of the ingredient or conduct a multitude of animal and human studies which are overly burdensome and costly. Establishing such excessive requirements is both contrary to Congressional intent and unnecessary given the safety record of dietary supplements over the past few decades.

    Any change in the manufacturing process of a dietary ingredient that results in chemical alteration of such ingredient or a change in specifications of the ingredient, regardless of how insignificant the alteration or change is, will require the submission of a NDI notification. This will discourage manufacturers from using the most advanced and efficient manufacturing technologies and pursuing methods that can improve the safety and effectiveness of dietary supplement products.

    Any increase of the amount of a dietary ingredient in a dietary supplement or any change in formula of a dietary supplement, regardless of how minute or insignificant, will require the submission of a NDI notification. This will discourage the innovation of new products.

     

    SAMPLE LETTER BELOW  

    November          , 2011

    To My Elected Representative:

    My name is                                                                         , and I am a constituent in your District.  I am deeply concerned about the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) recently issued Draft Guidance document entitled New Dietary Ingredient Notifications and Related Issues.

    Dietary supplements are an important part of my and my family’s health-maintenance routine.  We consider access to affordable supplements to be a crucial part of our healthy lifestyle to mitigate the need for expensive medical procedures and promote good health to improve and extend our lives.

    The FDA’s issuance of its draft Guidance is very troubling because it signals a dramatic shift in its policy towards dietary supplements, and I believe the FDA is attempting to establish a system of pre-market approval for these products.

    It has been nearly two decades since enactment of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA).  Back then the industry was in a fight for its life because of the FDA’s insistence on using the vague standards in the food additive provisions as a means of removing from the marketplace ingredients it disapproved of even for reasons unrelated to safety.  The FDA abused its authority, and through a lot of hard work, we won the battle.

    Now we find ourselves having to defend the very existence of this industry once again.  While DSHEA purposely had drafted in it a sensible and reasonable system by which the agency must be notified of the marketing of a new dietary ingredient and the basis for which the manufacturer believes that a dietary supplement containing such dietary ingredient will reasonably be expected to be safe the FDA has taken positions in its draft Guidance that indicate that it intends to treat dietary ingredients as food additives once again. 

    Even more disturbing is the FDA’s insistence that any change in the formula of a dietary supplement that contains a new dietary ingredient will require the submission of a NDI notification.  The agency has announced its intention that all dietary supplements containing new dietary ingredients be pre-cleared by the FDA.  This is contrary to Congressional intent in passing DSHEA. 

    If the FDA deems it necessary to make such drastic changes in the way dietary supplements are regulated, I think it should have to go through Congress.  This is a bureaucracy that is out-of-control. It would needlessly restrict access to safe dietary supplement products, and is a job killer for the dietary supplement industry.

    As a concerned constituent in your District, I am requesting that you do everything in your power to stop the FDA from enforcing DSHEA in a manner that is contrary to Congressional intent and in a manner that has the potential to destroy an industry that has brought so much good to so many people.

  • Vitamins Linked to Increased Risk of Death ?

    Is The Case for Dietary Supplements Collapsing ?

     

    By Dr. Dana Myatt

    Do vitamin supplements increase the risk of death as current headlines would have us believe?

    Before you give up your daily supplements, let’s take a careful look at the “science” behind the headlines.

     

    First, “consider the source.”

     

    Conventional medicine and medical researchers have been “gunning” for natural remedies and supplements for decades. This current “study” (and I use the term loosely) behind the headlines is brought to you by the same conventional researchers who gave us Premarin (which increases breast cancer risk), Vioxx and Avandia (responsible for 47,000 cardiac deaths since its introduction in 1999).

     

    Second, did you actually read the original study?

     

    I’m BETTING YOU DID NOT, and neither did the “reporters” from the Wall Street Journal. How do I know? Because the study is only available for pay — $30 to be exact — from the Archives of Internal Medicine. No one has access to the original study for free except for doctors who already subscribe to the magazine.

    As a doc who actually reads medical journal articles much of the day, I can tell you that “abstracts” (“the short course” at the beginning of articles) frequently say one thing while the actual conclusion of the article says something very different. In order to know what was really said, the original article needs to be read. How many “reporters” (another term I use loosely) bother to do this? Would they understand what they were reading even if they did purchase the original medical journal article?

     

    Third, can you remember what supplements you were taking and in what amounts, say, six years ago? No?

     

    Interesting, because this “study” did exactly that: asked participants to recall from memory what supplements they had taken for the past six years, times three. This means that eighteen years of vitamin and supplement intake “data” was collected from memory. What could possibly go wrong with a study like that?!

     

    Fourth — without boring you with research jargon such as “hazard ratios” and “multivariant analysis”, let me tell you what else the study showed:

     

    B complex vitamins were associated with a 7% reduction in mortality

    Vitamin C intake associated with a 4% reduction in mortality

    Vitamin D intake associated with an 8% reduction in mortality

    Magnesium intake associated with a 3% reduction in mortality

    Selenium intake associated with a 3% reduction in mortality

    Zinc intake associated with a 3% reduction in mortality

    Hundreds of well-conducted studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of nutritional supplementation. This statistically massaged collection of “from my distant memory” numbers doesn’t qualify as a real study in my book, and not in the mind of any genuine scientist.

    I’d be ashamed to put my name on a pseudo-study such as this. The fact that it has been misrepresented by the Lamestream media (do these folks actually “do” real journalism any more?) is an insult to thinking people everywhere.

    I wouldn’t even remotely consider giving up my daily vitamins based on such a pitiful “study,”  especially in view of the many studies showing their benefit.