Author: Wellness Club

  • Statins Proven To Cause Increased Injuries

    Part VI of a multi-installment series on cholesterol and the dangers of statin drugs.

    Part V can be found here: Saturated Fats Are NOT Bad For You – Here’s PROOF
    Part IV can be found here: Cholesterol: Life-Giving Or Life-Threatening?
    Part III can be found here: New Research Into Statin Drug Memory Loss
    Part II can be found here: Trade Your High Cholesterol For Diabetes!
    Part I can be found here: Lower Your Cholesterol – Lose Your Marbles?

    By Nurse Mark

     

    StatinWarning The news for statins just keeps getting worse and worse. First it was rhabdomyelosis, a condition that causes muscles to break down – literally melt –  and can lead to kidney damage. Then there is liver damage, sometimes severe enough to require liver transplant, and memory loss and confusion, and type II diabetes…

    Now researchers have found that compared to those people not using statin drugs, statin users were 19 percent more likely to have musculoskeletal problems of all kinds, and 13 percent more likely to suffer from dislocations, strains or sprains.

    What’s even more alarming is that the researcher indicates that people who are physically active are especially at risk!

    And this was not a rat study or small, limited study – no, this study compared nearly 7000 non-statin users with the same number of statin users. In an article published Published online June 3, 2013 in the Journal of the American Medical Association, Dr. Ishak Mansi describes his study of nearly 14,000 U.S. active-duty soldiers and veterans, and confirmed an association between the use of statins and musculoskeletal injuries.

    Conclusions and Relevance:  Musculoskeletal conditions, arthropathies, injuries, and pain are more common among statin users than among similar nonusers. The full spectrum of statins’ musculoskeletal adverse events may not be fully explored, and further studies are warranted, especially in physically active individuals.

     

    Predictably the American heart association is quick to say “Don’t even think of not taking statins…”

    In an article in the government’s National Institutes of Health MedlinePlus news website that discussed this study, Dr. Gregg Fonarow, a spokesman for the American Heart Association, did his best to put a positive spin on the findings saying that statin users should be “reassured” by the findings.

    “This study provides further evidence that the proven cardiovascular benefits outweigh any potential risks, including musculoskeletal issues,”

     

    So, according to Dr. Fonarow, it’s “don’t worry, be happy” when it comes to the damaging side effects of statins.

    Interestingly, Dr. Fonarow has received funding from Pfizer, Merck, Schering Plough, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Sanofi-Aventis – all of whom depend heavily on the continued sales of statin drugs to maintain their obscene profits… Do you think there could there be even the tiniest hint of a conflict of interest there? No, I didn’t think so either…

    Yep, I’m reassured all right – reassured that I never, ever want to take this dangerous, damaging drug!

    Muscle damage, kidney damage, liver damage, memory loss and confusion, type II diabetes, and increased risk for musculo-skeletal injuries – all that in exchange for depleting your body of cholesterol, a substance essential for health and life?

    There are better options!

    Further Reading:

    Lower Your Cholesterol – Lose Your Marbles?

    Trade Your High Cholesterol For Diabetes!

    New Research Into Statin Drug Memory Loss

    Cholesterol: Life-Giving Or Life-Threatening?

    Saturated Fats Are NOT Bad For You – Here’s PROOF

     

    References:

    JAMA study publication: Statins and Musculoskeletal Conditions, Arthropathies, and Injuries
    JAMA Intern Med. 2013
    http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1691918

    MedlinePlus article:
    Cholesterol Drugs Linked to Muscle, Joint Problems: Study
    But heart benefits of statins outweigh risks, expert says
    Monday, June 3, 2013
    http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_137444.html

    Dr Fonarow financial ties: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/737248

  • B12 And Prostate Cancer: A Connection?

    By Nurse Mark

     

    Ahh, the Internet – a wild and woolly place. Full of lies, damned lies, and statistics. Serving up a never-ending smorgasbord of fact, fiction, conjecture, and opinion. Providing “authoritative research” from such diverse locations as one man’s laboratory notes to another man’s easy chair fantasies.

    Our patients and readers are constantly bombarded with well-meaning but often erroneous “medical information” that is often based on the misunderstanding of a research paper or, worse yet, some news reporter’s sensationalized mis-reporting of the results of research.

    This results in endless fear and confusion as folks struggle to sort out the good, the bad, and the ugly in terms of medical information. Fortunately, many people have the good sense to ask Dr. Myatt to help them separate the wheat from the chaff…

    Here is one fellow’s question:

    50 year old male considering b12 supplementation because of tiredness/memory problems but concerned about the link between prostate cancer and b12 levels.

     

    Well, a quick “Google-search” for this subject turns up some frightening posts in places like prostate cancer survivors websites and a vegan chat boards. These posts are based on the the selective reading of a number of studies that have been done on the relationships between B Vitamins and cancers. None of the studies actually say that vitamin B12 causes prostate cancer, though one might be excused for thinking so based on the breathless posts on some of these chat forums.

    What the studies do say, in essence, is that there is little or no correlation between folate or B Vitamins and prostate cancer until the blood levels of these nutrients become very high – at which time there appears to be a small increase in risk for prostate cancer.

    Here are what some of the studies have to say:

     

    First, a 2003 study, funded by the National Cancer Institute:

    Null Association between Prostate Cancer and Serum Folate, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B12, and Homocysteine

    Serum folate, B6, B12, and homocysteine were not associated with prostate cancer risk. There was no evidence of effect modification by age, intervention group, smoking, body mass index, BPH, or intake of folate, B6, B12, or methionine; however, the association between homocysteine and prostate cancer risk was modified significantly by alcohol intake, with a positive association observed among those who consumed more alcohol and a modest inverse association among those who consumed less alcohol. Consistent with this, an opposite pattern was observed for serum folate (interaction not significant). We observed no material differences in the associations based on disease stage.

     

    Europe, 2008:

    Circulating concentrations of folate and vitamin B12 in relation to prostate cancer risk: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study.

    CONCLUSION:
    This study does not provide strong support for an association between prostate cancer risk and circulating concentrations of folate or vitamin B(12). Elevated concentrations of vitamin B(12) may be associated with an increased risk for advanced stage prostate cancer, but this association requires examination in other large prospective studies.

     

    And Norway, 2013:

    Serum folate and vitamin B12 concentrations in relation to prostate cancer risk–a Norwegian population-based nested case-control study of 3000 cases and 3000 controls within the JANUS cohort.

    CONCLUSION:
    This large-scale population-based study suggests that high serum folate concentration may be associated with modestly increased prostate cancer risk. We did not observe an association between vitamin B12 status and prostate cancer risk.

     

    Now, I do not consider myself to be an authority on the subject of prostate cancer – but my reading of these studies and numerous others leads me to conclude that unless I’m going to “go overboard” and take very large doses of folate or vitamin B12 I’m not really going to worry about it causing my prostate to become cancerous.

    Indeed, given the very serious consequences of Folate and B12 deficiency (and the fact that I like the “energy boost”) I am personally fond of a product called B-12 Extreme  – a top quality formulation that contains all 4 forms of vitamin B12. I also use Maxi Multi every day which provides me with an optimal amount of folate.

    Please take a moment to read about B-12 Extreme here.

    For more information about vitamin B12 please see our Medical White Paper Is Science On The Verge of an ME/CFS Breakthrough? The Vitamin B12 – ME/CFS Connection.

    My conclusion?

     

    I don’t know enough about the fellow who asked this question to be able to make any recommendation specific to him – there could be a dozen other things going on in his life that I’m not aware of.

    However – Tiredness and memory problems can certainly be associated with deficient vitamin B12 levels. Unless there is active prostate cancer going on, sensible supplementation with vitamin B12 would seem a reasonable course of action.

     

    References:

     

    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Feb;17(2):279-85.
    Circulating concentrations of folate and vitamin B12 in relation to prostate cancer risk: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study. Johansson M, et.al
    Source: Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Sweden.
    CONCLUSION:
    This study does not provide strong support for an association between prostate cancer risk and circulating concentrations of folate or vitamin B(12). Elevated concentrations of vitamin B(12) may be associated with an increased risk for advanced stage prostate cancer, but this association requires examination in other large prospective studies.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18268110
    and
    In conclusion, this study does not provide support for the hypothesis that circulating concentrations of folate or
    vitamin B12 are related to prostate cancer risk. Further prospective studies are needed to investigate the possible
    association between high concentrations of vitamin B12 and increased risk of advanced stage prostate cancer.
    http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/17/2/279
    Access the most recent version of this article at:
    http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/17/2/279.full.pdf

    Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;42(1):201-10.
    Serum folate and vitamin B12 concentrations in relation to prostate cancer risk–a Norwegian population-based nested case-control study of 3000 cases and 3000 controls within the JANUS cohort.
    de Vogel S, Meyer K, et.al.
    Source: Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
    CONCLUSION:
    This large-scale population-based study suggests that high serum folate concentration may be associated with modestly increased prostate cancer risk. We did not observe an association between vitamin B12 status and prostate cancer risk.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23508410

    American Association for Cancer Research
    Null Association between Prostate Cancer and Serum Folate, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B12, and Homocysteine
    Stephanie J. Weinstein et.al.
    Serum folate, B6, B12, and homocysteine were not associated with prostate cancer risk (Table 1)⇓ . There was no evidence of effect modification by age, intervention group, smoking, body mass index, BPH, or intake of folate, B6, B12, or methionine; however, the association between homocysteine and prostate cancer risk was modified significantly by alcohol intake (p interaction = 0.04), with a positive association observed among those who consumed more alcohol (OR = 1.71 and 95% CI = 0.76–3.83 for highest versus lowest quartile) and a modest inverse association among those who consumed less alcohol. Consistent with this, an opposite pattern was observed for serum folate (interaction not significant). We observed no material differences in the associations based on disease stage.
    http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/12/11/1271.long

  • Some Research Into The Arts

    By Nurse Mark

     

    Regular readers know that we here at The Wellness Club spend much of each day immersed in medical research – indeed, most of our readers know that you need to get up pretty early in the morning to find some tidbit of medical information that Dr. Myatt or I have not already heard of.

    Most people don’t know however that we are also interested in the Fine Arts and enjoy occasional research into the history of the arts.

    For example after considerable research, we have discovered that the artist Vincent Van Gogh had many relatives.

    Among them were:

    His dizzy aunt… Verti Gogh
    The brother who ate prunes… Gotta Gogh
    The constipated uncle… Cant Gogh
    The brother who worked at a convenience store… Stopn Gogh
    The grandfather from Yugoslavia… U Gogh
    The cousin from Illinois… Chica Gogh
    His magician uncle… Wherediddit Gogh
    His Mexican cousin… Amee Gogh
    The Mexican cousin’s American half brother… Grin Gogh
    The ballroom dancing aunt… Tan Gogh
    A sister who loved disco… Go Gogh
    The nephew who drove a stage coach… Wellsfar Gogh
    The bird lover uncle… Flamin Gogh
    His nephew psychoanalyst… E. Gogh
    The fruit loving cousin… Man Gogh
    An aunt who taught positive thinking… Wayto Gogh
    The little bouncy nephew… Poe Gogh
    The hairdresser… Washan Gogh
    The marathon runner… Readysteady Gogh

    OK, OK… I’ll stop it!

    You did know that I am a fan of “the lowest form of humor,” the pun, right?

    I guess I’d better Gogh now!

    Cheers,
    Nurse Mark

  • Saturated Fats Are NOT Bad For You – Here’s PROOF

    Part V of a multi-installment series on cholesterol and the dangers of statin drugs.

    Part IV can be found here: Cholesterol: Life-Giving Or Life-Threatening?
    Part III can be found here: New Research Into Statin Drug Memory Loss
    Part II can be found here: Trade Your High Cholesterol For Diabetes!
    Part I can be found here: Lower Your Cholesterol – Lose Your Marbles?

    By Nurse Mark

     

    StatinWarning After decades of being told that saturated fats in our diet is what has caused untold misery and suffering for mankind in the form of heart disease, the truth is beginning to come out. Every day new voices join a growing chorus that are shouting “the emperor has no clothes” as they present their research showing that saturated fats like animal fats, eggs, cheese, butter, coconut and palm oils, fish oils, and others are not the “instant heart-attack” that we’ve been warned about – that indeed, our obsession with “low fat” and conventional medicine’s war on fats is actually harming us.

    Dr Glen D Lawrence of Long Island University in Brooklyn, NY is the most recent of these scientists brave enough to speak out against the fat-is-bad party line.

    In a study published May 1, 2013 in the journal Advances in Nutrition Lawrence concludes:

    “The influence of dietary fats on serum cholesterol has been overstated, and a physiological mechanism for saturated fats causing heart disease is still missing.”

     

    He goes on to say:

    Various aldehydes produced in the oxidation of PUFAs, as well as sugars, are known to initiate or augment several diseases, such as cancer, inflammation, asthma, type 2 diabetes, atherosclerosis, and endothelial dysfunction. Saturated fats per se may not be responsible for many of the adverse health effects with which they have been associated; instead, oxidation of PUFAs in those foods may be the cause of any associations that have been found. Consequently, the dietary recommendations to restrict saturated fats in the diet should be revised to reflect differences in handling before consumption, e.g., dairy fats are generally not heated to high temperatures. It is time to reevaluate the dietary recommendations that focus on lowering serum cholesterol and to use a more holistic approach to dietary policy.

     

    So, there we have it – saturated fats are not “the great Satan” that the religion of no fat preaches about.

    Lawrence’s contention that oxidized PUFAs (Poly Unsaturated Fatty Acids – like vegetable oils) agrees with our experience – these oils such as flax oil and olive oil are not necessarily bad, but they are easily damaged and oxidized turning them rancid. They should never be used to cook with as they do not tolerate heat.

    What we need to be restricting is our exposure to trans fats, PUFAs, sugars, and starches. These are the things that are responsible for the explosion of cardiovascular disease, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes in our modern world.

    Ditch the “low-fat” foods, the margarine, and that “heart-healthy” corn oil; enjoy your steak, butter, bacon, and eggs.

    Your heart will thank you!

    Reference:

    Dietary Fats and Health: Dietary Recommendations in the Context of Scientific Evidence
    Glen D. Lawrence, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Long Island University, Brooklyn, NY
    Adv Nutr May 2013 Adv Nutr vol. 4: 294-302, 2013
    http://advances.nutrition.org/content/4/3/294.long#abstract-1

  • Cholesterol: Life-Giving Or Life-Threatening?

    Part IV of a multi-installment series on cholesterol and the dangers of statin drugs.

    Part III can be found here: New Research Into Statin Drug Memory Loss
    Part II can be found here: Trade Your High Cholesterol For Diabetes!
    Part I can be found here: Lower Your Cholesterol – Lose Your Marbles?

    By Nurse Mark

     

    In recent HealthBeat articles I’ve been talking a lot about statin drugs and their dangers.

    Conventional medicine tells us we must take statin drugs to lower our cholesterol levels and thus prevent heart attacks.

    Is that true? If someone has a high cholesterol level will they have a heart attack just as surely as night follows day? Is lower always better when it comes to cholesterol levels?

    Hearing Big Pharma talk you could easily believe that cholesterol is a toxic substance that must be eliminated from our bodies by any means.

    We think a little differently here. Let’s learn a little more about cholesterol.

    What is this stuff, anyway?

    Cholesterol is a fatty, waxy substance, an organic molecule – a sterol – that is an essential part of the structure of almost all the cells in our body.

    Where does it come from?

    Cholesterol can be obtained from diet from animal sources like meat and dairy – though plant sources may contribute small amounts of cholesterol-like substances called phytosterols. It is also made in substantial amounts by the liver. It is so important that even the cells themselves are able to make cholesterol – usually in response to high insulin levels.

    What good is it?

    Cholesterol helps make the outer coating or wall of cells, keeping them “waterproof” and controlling what can enter and exit the cell. It is used to make the bile acids that digest food (especially fatty foods) in the intestine. It is used by the body to make Vitamin D and steroid hormones such as estrogen in women and testosterone in men. Cholesterol also forms the “insulation” that protects our nerves ability to transmit impulses and is used as a material to repair irritations and damage in our blood vessels.

    How much of it do we need?

    According to Harvard University researchers, we require about 1000 mg (one gram) of cholesterol each day for our body to function properly. We could eat no cholesterol at all and our liver would still make that much or more.

    Is it really that simple? Isn’t there “good” and “bad” cholesterol?

    You’re right, it’s not so simple. There are several different forms of cholesterol, each doing different jobs in our body.

    The good, the bad, and the ugly?

    Kind of: here is the brief rundown on the different forms of cholesterol:

    First, cholesterol itself really isn’t very soluble in blood (think of oil in water) so our body wraps it up into molecules called lipoproteins so it can be moved around through our arteries and veins.

    The good: HDL (High Density Lipoprotein) cholesterol is considered “good” because it gathers up unneeded cholesterol from the blood vessels and cells and transports it back to the liver for recycling or excretion as bile. HDL is also felt to have an anti-inflammatory role in the body.

    The bad: LDL (Low Density Lipoprotein) cholesterol carries cholesterol to the areas of the body where it is needed. It has been thought to be “bad” because high levels of LDL in the blood have been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. However, “associated with” is not the same as “causes” and we like to refer to cholesterol as it relates to heart disease as “found at the scene of the crime, but NOT GUILTY!

    To make things more confusing, there are two sub-types of LDL: Small, dense LDL is also considered to be a form of “bad” cholesterol while large, buoyant LDL is less harmful. (There is also a form of HDL that is considered “bad

    The ugly: Oxidized LDL cholesterol particles are strongly associated with atheroma formation in the walls of arteries, a condition known as atherosclerosis which is the principal cause of coronary heart disease and other forms of cardiovascular disease. Oxidized LDL particles contain free radicals and are irritating and damaging to the cell walls, causing inflammation and even endothelial (the cells that line the blood vessels) death. Our body then tries to repair the damage by patching it with LDL cholesterol deposits – like a protective “scab” inside the blood vessel. (Remember – LDL is “found at the scene of the crime, but NOT GUILTY!”) Oxidized LDL is also said to increase the production of a substance called thromboxane in blood platelets – which promotes blood clotting.

    How does the “Ugly” happen?

    A number of things have been shown to cause LDL to become “oxidized” – some of them include:

    Smoking – is this any surprise? Smoking also inhibits our ability to make prostacyclin, a substance that inhibits blood clotting. By increasing the ratio of thromboxane to prostacyclin, abnormal clotting can occur, causing cardiovascular events and sudden death.

    Trans fats and polyunsaturated fats. For years conventional medicine has tried to blame saturated fats like butter for heart disease, telling us to eat margarine and vegetable oils instead. That is beginning to change, with conventional researchers Now beginning to acknowledge that saturated fats are healthy , polyunsaturated fats are easily damaged and can quickly become unhealthy, and trans fats are very disruptive and damaging and should be avoided at all costs.

    Metabolic Syndrome, pre-diabetes, obesity and diabetes have all been linked to increases in oxidized LDL, and correcting those conditions appears to reduce oxidized LDL.

    Deficiencies in vitamin E, carotenoids, and vitamin C – all potent antioxidants – are also associated with the oxidation of LDL.

    And the odd man out:

    Triglycerides are fat-like substances that circulate in the blood. Conventional medicine associates high triglyceride levels with heart disease in the same way they do LDL cholesterol – and they claim that there is great benefit in dramatically lowering triglyceride levels. However, while high triglyceride levels are related to an increased risk of heart disease, they are also correlated with low HDL (good) cholesterol, and with small, dense (less bad)  LDL, so it’s not clear whether high triglycerides are really an independent risk factor for heart disease or just a risk marker for heart disease – as in “found at the scene of the crime, but not guilty!” 

    What to do about cholesterol?

    First, don’t let conventional medicine and Big Pharma frighten you about cholesterol – it really is our friend, and essential to life. Cholesterol is essential for so many functions – our thoughts, emotions, and mental functions, our digestion, our hormones and everything that they control for us, for repairing our wounds, and even protecting us from infection.

    Current conventional medical guidelines claim that total cholesterol should be below 200 mg/dL, LDL below 100 mg/dL, triglycerides below 150 mg/dL, and HDL above 40 mg/dL for men and 50 mg/dL for women.

    Please remember though that these recommendations are used to sell patients on the need to take statin drugs, and Big Pharma is constantly pushing for ever-lower total cholesterol, LDL, and triglyceride numbers in order to sell more of their drugs.

    Next, be aware that there is very little real proof that artificially lowering total cholesterol, LDL, or triglycerides does anyone much good, and there is evidence that for many, higher cholesterol levels can actually be protective. There is statistical data showing that low cholesterol levels in seniors are associated with an increase in all-cause mortality.

    Finally, it is not the raw numbers themselves that should be used to determine whether one’s cholesterol is “too high” – it is the relationship of those numbers to the other numbers – that is, the ratio of LDL to HDL and even the more detailed measurement of “large” and “small” particle LDL – that should be looked at.

    On Lowering cholesterol:

    Statins, of course, are the first and often the only choice of conventional doctors when they find cholesterol and triglyceride numbers above the conventionally accepted range. Some silly diet advice, such as “avoid eggs and fatty foods” may also be given.

    Both of those recommendations, are just plain wrong. Statin drugs come with a wide variety of very worrisome side effects such as loss of memory and metal function, muscle damage, diabetes, and liver failure. Avoiding dietary cholesterol, as we have seen, is futile – our liver will just take up the slack to make this important substance, and the foods that are “substituted” for healthy cholesterol-containing foods often contain high amounts of trans fats or high fructose corn syrup and other sugars – which all contribute to the creation of the artery-damaging oxidized LDL that we learned about earlier.

    Since we believe that cholesterol is actually a good and necessary thing, we feel that instead of simply trying to slam down the numbers with a drug a more sensible approach is to shift that important LDL/HDL ration toward more of the protective HDL and to avoid creating the blood vessel damaging oxidized LDL.

    How to shift the balance toward better cholesterol and cardiovascular health

    Hint: Lifestyle and diet are amazingly effective!

    Here are some things you can do (not in any order of importance – they are all important!)

    • Moderate alcohol – one or two drinks per day – has been shown to raise HDL cholesterol – but too much can significantly raise triglyceride levels.
    • Do you smoke? Stop! Stopping smoking lowers LDL and raises HDL cholesterol.
    • Are you overweight? Losing weight raises HDL cholesterol.
    • Get some sun – researchers have shown that exposure to ultraviolet radiation (sunlight) results in a significant and long-lasting reduction in cholesterol levels.
    • Relax – stress reduction, meditation and yoga have been shown to reduce total and LDL cholesterol and triglycerides.
    • Get moving – aerobic exercise (walking, jogging, swimming, bicycling, rowing, stair-climbing, etc) improves the ratio of LDL to HDL significantly.
    • Eat fats wisely – avoid trans fats. A diet low in trans fats lowers overall cholesterol and raises HDL.
    • Avoid sugars and high glycemic index carbohydrates (potatoes, rice, bread, corn, etc.) – a diet high in sucrose has been shown to decrease HDL – the “good” cholesterol.
    • Get more fiber – a minimum of 2-10 grams/day of soluble fiber lowers cholesterol levels very significantly.

     

    Getting the Big Picture:

    Instead of focusing on one very small aspect of cardiovascular health, cholesterol, and trying to chase laboratory numbers with drugs, Dr. Myatt recommends that people look at the overall picture of their heart health risk factors and she has researched and prepared a Medical White Paper that discusses these risk factors in detail. She is making this paper available to you free of charge. I hope you will take advantage of this offer and download and study this document. Print it and discuss it with your doctor. Use it to reduce your risk factors so that you can enjoy a long and healthy life – and continue to be a HealthBeat News subscriber!

    Please visit this webpage at The Wellness Club to obtain your copy of Dr. Myatt’s Cardiovascular Checklist.

    Please print this Medical White Paper, including the pages of references, so that you can show it to your doctor / cardiologist. When he / she tells you that 1) he has never heard of some of these tests, 2) you don’t need them, 3) he’s not going to order them for you, and 4) your insurance won’t pay for them anyway, please visit Dr. Myatt’s Wellness Club where Dr. Myatt will make these tests available to you, and at a very reasonable cost.

    Dr. Myatt’s Cardiovascular Risk Profile Lab Testing information.

    Dr. Myatt will also be following up this article with one of her own detailing her favorite natural supplements and remedies to improve your cholesterol ratios and cardiovascular health – so stay tuned!

     

    References and additional reading:

    CHOLESTEROL (and other cardiovascular risk markers) http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~shlevy/choles.htm

    Excerpted from The Harvard Medical School Guide to Lowering Your Cholesterol
    By Mason W. Freeman, M.D. with Christine Junge
    http://www.health.harvard.edu/newsweek/Understanding_Cholesterol.htm

    The Cholesterol Myths by Uffe Ravnskov, M.D., Ph.D.
    Your cholesterol tells very little about your future health – An excerpt from my previous book The Cholesterol Myths (out of print). http://www.ravnskov.nu/myth1.htm

    Weston A Price Foundation
    Myths & Truths About Cholesterol
    http://www.westonaprice.org/cardiovascular-disease/myths-a-truths-about-cholesterol

    Weston A Price Foundation
    Cholesterol: Friend Or Foe?
    http://www.westonaprice.org/know-your-fats/cholesterol-friend-or-foe

    Oxysterols and TBARS are among the LDL oxidation products which enhance thromboxane A2 synthesis by platelets
    MohamedainM Mahfouza, FredA Kummerowa, ,
    University of Illinois, Burnsides Research Laboratory, 1208 W. Pennsylvania Ave., Urbana, IL 61801 and The H.E. Moore Heart Research Foundation, Champaign, IL 61820, USA
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090698098000562

    Medscape News
    Dietary Saturated Fat Has Undeserved Bad Reputation, Says Review
    Steve Stiles, May 17, 2013
    “The influence of dietary fats on serum cholesterol has been overstated,” concludes a review in an American Society for Nutrition publication that, in its words, “calls for a rational reevaluation of existing dietary recommendations that focus on minimizing dietary SFAs [saturated fatty acids], for which mechanisms for adverse health effects are lacking”
    http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/804400?src=wnl_edit_specol

    Triglycerides and Risk for Coronary Heart Disease
    Patrick E. McBride, MD, MPH
    JAMA. 2007;298(3):336-338. doi:10.1001/jama.298.3.336.
    “…a high serum triglyceride level is associated with abnormal lipoprotein metabolism, as well as with other CHD risk factors including obesity, insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus, and lowered levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). When determining CHD risk, how important is it to know which came first—high serum triglyceride levels or the risk factors that cause high levels?”
    http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=207954

    Rejuvenation Res. 2011 April; 14(2): 111–118.
    Effect of Obesity, Serum Lipoproteins, and Apolipoprotein E Genotypes on Mortality in Hospitalized Elderly Patients
    Filomena Addante, M.D. et. al.
    “In addition, we found that, unlike in nonelderly patients, higher levels of TC in females and LDL-C in males are associated with a lower risk of mortality. This paradoxical result is in line with previous reports showing that hypercholesterolemia is associated with lower mortality in elderly patients. ”
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3092981/

    Wesley D, Cox HF. Modeling total cholesterol as predictor of mortality: the low-cholesterol paradox. J Insur Med. 2011;42(2-4):62-75.

    Nago N, Ishikawa S, Goto T, et al. Low cholesterol is associated with mortality from stroke, heart disease, and cancer: the Jichi Medical School Cohort Study. J Epidemiol. 2011;21(1):67-74.

    Schalk BW, Visser M, Deeg DJ, et al. Lower levels of serum albumin and total cholesterol and future decline in functional performance in older persons: the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Age Ageing. 2004 May;33(3):266-72.

    Altschul R. “Ultraviolet irradiation and cholesterol metabolism.” Arch Phys Med 1955; 36: 394

    Effects of dietary sucrose on factors influencing cholesterol gall stone formation
    D WERNER, P M EMMETT, AND K W HEATON
    From the University Department of Medicine, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol
    Hence, the well-documented ability of dietary sucrose to raise plasma triglyceride concentrations, which was confirmed in this study, suggests that dietary sucrose will predispose at least some individuals to gall stones.
    http://gut.bmj.com/content/25/3/269.full.pdf

    Pediatrics. 1995 Nov;96(5 Pt 2):1005-9.
    The role of fiber in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia in children and adolescents.
    Kwiterovich PO Jr.
    Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
    For example, the addition of supplemented soluble fiber (psyllium) to a step 1 diet may provide additional lowering of LDL cholesterol of 10% to 15%.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7494671