Blog

  • New Research Into Statin Drug Memory Loss

    Part III of a multi-installment series on cholesterol and the dangers of statin drugs.

    Part II can be found here: Trade Your High Cholesterol For Diabetes!
    Part I can be found here: Lower Your Cholesterol – Lose Your Marbles?

    By Nurse Mark

     

    StatinWarning With evidence growing daily of the damaging health effects of statin drugs, more and more researchers are turning their attention to the problem and new information is emerging that helps to explain how these drugs do their damage.

    University of Arizona researchers have described their findings in a April 8, 2013 news article: Research Reveals Possible Reason for Cholesterol-Drug Side Effects

    A University of Arizona research team has made a novel discovery in brain cells being treated with statin drugs: unusual swellings within neurons, which the team has termed the “beads-on-a-string” effect.

     

    According to researchers:

    In addition to detecting the beads effect, the team came upon yet another major finding: when statins are removed, the beads-on-a-string effect disappears, offering great promise to those being treated with the drugs.

     

    The research team is also looking into whether there may be a genetic susceptibility to this distressing effect of statins on neurons, which are the nerve cells that make up our brains and nervous system – but for now, the good news in this report is that the swellings that cause the neurons to malfunction and thus cause memory to disappear and thinking to be clouded tend to get better and eventually disappear after the statin drugs are stopped:

    … Chuang was testing gene mutations and found variation in sensitivity to statins. It was through the work of Chuang and Kraft that the team would later determine that, after removing the statins, the cells were able to repair themselves; the neurotoxicity was not permanent, Restifo said.

    “In the clinical literature, you can read reports on fuzzy thinking, which stops when a patient stops taking statins. So, that was a very important demonstration of a parallel between the clinical reports and the laboratory phenomena,” Restifo said.

     

    Whatever the cause for this statin-caused memory and mental function impairment, it is reassuring to know that it need not be permanent – and that simply stopping the drug can allow memory and clear thinking to return.

    Too bad the other dangerous side effects of statins like Type II diabetes, liver failure, and muscle damage aren’t temporary!

     

    Additional reading:

    Please read our recent article on Statins and Memory Loss: Lower Your Cholesterol – Lose Your Marbles?

    FDA Consumer Information: FDA Expands Advice on Statin Risks
    http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm293330.htm

    FDA Drug Safety Communication: Important safety label changes to cholesterol-lowering statin drugs
    http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm293101.htm

    Dangers of Statin Drugs: What You Haven’t Been Told About Popular Cholesterol-Lowering Medicines         
    Sally Fallon and Mary G. Enig, PhD
    http://www.westonaprice.org/cardiovascular-disease/dangers-of-statin-drugs

  • BioIdentical Hormones, Compounded Drugs Under Attack – Again

    By Nurse Mark

     

    Laws were broken and people were harmed, even killed by a compounding pharmacy in Massachusetts.

    The company, New England Compounding Center (NECC) appears to have gone far beyond what most of us envision when we think of a compounding pharmacy. NECC looks to have had visions of being “Big Pharma” without having to bother with all the troublesome FDA oversight that goes with being a drug manufacturer.

    And so, because laws were broken and people were killed, NECC (meaning the people in charge of NECC) should rightfully “have the book thrown at ’em.” If it is shown that there was negligence on the part of the management of NECC then it would be reasonable for people to be looking at serious prison time since allowing things to happen that cause people to die is known as homicide or even murder.

    Unfortunately, in true knee-jerk fashion, our politicians have become involved.

    A complex bill has been drafted that will vastly increase the power, scope, and intrusiveness of the FDA and will seriously limit your ability to access compounded medicines – things like custom Bio Identical Hormones, custom transdermal patches, and custom time-release formulations.

    This bill, introduced in the 113th Congress as S.959 — the Pharmaceutical Compounding Quality and Accountability Act, gives the FDA, which has been historically biased against supplements and integrative medicine, far too much ability to ban compounded drugs such as thyroid medications and estriol and other hormones.

    This bill is not really new. The FDA has been seeking to expand it’s powers for some time, and they tried to do this in 2008 with the female hormone estriol. Stymied, they did not have the authority to enforce their actions.  S.959 would give the FDA the full authority that they seek, and allow them to ban commonly used Bio Identical Hormone Treatments (BHRT).

    For millions of women it could mean being forced back to using Big Pharma’s one-size-fits-all synthetic hormones – to the delight of the pharmaceutical companies and their shareholders. Sales of Premarin and Prempro have dropped steadily since 2002 when two big government-sponsored studies found that the drugs raised the risks of breast cancer, stroke, and heart attack. Wyeth, the manufacturer of Premarin and Prempro, petitioned the FDA in 2005 to restrict the availability of competing compounded “bio-identical” hormones and similar efforts have been ongoing ever since.

    It is obvious to us here at The Wellness Club that Big Pharma is not going to rest until they have achieved their monopoly of medicine, and that they subscribe to the “Never let a good crisis go to waste” strategy of politics.

    What can you do?

    We have two resources for you where you can quickly and easily send a message to your elected representatives to voice your opinion about this newest power-grab:

    A website called MyMedsMatter has an easy contact form here: http://www.mymedsmatter.com/?vvsrc=%2fCampaigns%2f32492%2fRespond

    And The Alliance For Natural health also has a good article on this important subject and a “Take Action” link where you can contact your representatives. Check it out here: http://www.anh-usa.org/compounding-pharmacy-bill-third-draft-still-some-major-problems%E2%80%94and-no-time-to-lose/

    We urge you to take action along with us to protect your access to compounded medicines and bio identical hormone therapy.

  • Trade Your High Cholesterol For Diabetes!

    Part II of a multi-installment series on cholesterol and the dangers of statin drugs.

    What a Deal! You can drive your cholesterol levels dangerously low while developing Type II Diabetes at the same time! Wow – thanks Big Pharma!

     

    By Nurse Mark

     

    StatinWarning In my last HealthBeat article Lower Your Cholesterol – Lose Your Marbles? I talked about how the mighty FDA – the thuggish bodyguard to Big Pharma – has had to ask it’s corporate masters to include new warnings about dangerous side effects on the information inserts for statin drugs.

    You know the ones, those tightly folded papers covered in tiny print that describe a drug’s side effects in mind-numbingly boring terms. You read them all the time, right? Yeah, I thought so…

    The dangers of these drugs are becoming so obvious that the FDA can’t ignore them any longer – hence the new warnings about memory loss and confusion, Type II diabetes, liver failure, and muscle damage.

    Even so, says the FDA, we mustn’t stop using statins, for their “benefits” far outweigh the “rare” risks of complications like these.

    We’ll talk about the supposed “benefits” of statins in an upcoming article, but for right now let’s look at one of these “rare” risks that the FDA is finally admitting to.

    Folks, I don’t know about you, but any risk of developing Type II diabetes with all the complications that go along with it is too great a risk for me to take willingly. Some of those complications include heart disease. Uh, wait a minute… isn’t that what the statin was supposed to fix?

    And “rare”? It seems to me that with the increase in risk for developing diabetes while taking a statin running as high as 22 percent according to a most recent study this is a risk that is a little more than “rare.”

    Canadian researchers examined the medical records of over a million and a half elderly people in the province of Ontario to examine the association between statin use and new onset diabetes and they reported their findings in the British Medical Journal.

    The results do not look good for statins, and while there will surely be attempts made to discredit the study, the results of the researchers are not new – similar results have been obtained in past studies. The evidence is mounting.

    In a study published in the medical journal The Lancet in 2010 researcher David Preiss, MRCP, a clinical research fellow at the British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Center at the University of Glasgow in Scotland reported similar, though less dramatic findings. That study was however very careful to state the opinion that the risk of diabetes was low compared to the risk of heart disease and that patients should not stop taking statins…

    Now, to be fair, some research has shown that some forms of statin drugs may actually protect from the development of diabetes – in previous research, the popular statin Crestor has been associated with up to a 27 percent higher risk of diabetes, while the older and somewhat less popular statin Pravachol was said to be linked to a 30 percent lower risk. While it may be better from the standpoint of causing diabetes, Pravachol still brings all the other worrisome side effects common to the other statin drugs – muscle damage, liver damage, memory loss and confusion. Not my idea of a fun time…

    So, is it worth it? Remember, cholesterol is essential to life – so essential that our liver will make it from new even if we never eat another thing containing cholesterol. Cholesterol is a major component of the walls of our cells – it is our “waterproofing.” It is the substance that keeps the insides in and the outside out. It’s also the basic building block for the hormones that keep our endocrine system going. It’s the substance that forms the insulating sheaths on our nerves, just like the insulation on the wires in your home.

    Is it really worth driving away this essential substance, at the risk of inviting in diabetes?

    Personally I don’t think so – and we’ll talk more about some of the other dangers of statin drugs soon!

     

    Additional reading:

    FDA Consumer Information: FDA Expands Advice on Statin Risks
    http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm293330.htm

    FDA Drug Safety Communication: Important safety label changes to cholesterol-lowering statin drugs
    http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm293101.htm

    Dangers of Statin Drugs: What You Haven’t Been Told About Popular Cholesterol-Lowering Medicines          
    Sally Fallon and Mary G. Enig, PhD
    http://www.westonaprice.org/cardiovascular-disease/dangers-of-statin-drugs

    http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)61965-6/abstract
    The Lancet, Volume 375, Issue 9716, Pages 735 – 742, 27 February 2010
    Statins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin trials
    Findings
    We identified 13 statin trials with 91 140 participants, of whom 4278 (2226 assigned statins and 2052 assigned control treatment) developed diabetes during a mean of 4 years. Statin therapy was associated with a 9% increased risk for incident diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 1·09; 95% CI 1·02—1·17), with little heterogeneity (I2=11%) between trials. Meta-regression showed that risk of development of diabetes with statins was highest in trials with older participants, but neither baseline body-mass index nor change in LDL-cholesterol concentrations accounted for residual variation in risk.

    http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_137140.html
    Could Statins Raise Diabetes Risk? Some popular brands associated with high blood sugar levels in study, but odds of problems are low. By Margaret Farley Steele Friday, May 24, 2013 MedLinePlus

    http://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f2610
    Risk of incident diabetes among patients treated with statins: population based study
    BMJ 2013 (Published 23 May 2013)
    Discussion
    In this population based study, we found that patients treated with atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, or simvastatin were at increased risk of new onset diabetes compared with those treated with pravastatin.

  • Lower Your Cholesterol – Lose Your Marbles?

    Part I of a multi-installment series on cholesterol and the dangers of statin drugs.

    By Nurse Mark

     

    It seems so…

    StatinWarning

    The evidence has become so compelling that statin drugs cause memory and cognition (thinking) problems that even the mighty FDA, sworn protector of the pharmaceutical industry, has been forced to require drug makers to mention the possibility of “Memory loss and confusion” as an adverse effect in the fine print of their drug labels.

    Well, whoop-tee-doo!
    Who reads all that fine print stuff anyway?!?

    But, says the FDA “expert”, you mustn’t stop taking those statins because the drug companies say they will keep you from having a heart attack, and besides, these episodes of cloudy thinking, loss of memory, and confusion are “rare.”

    Riiiight… “rare.”

    So rare that the FDA has been forced to ‘fess up and require label warnings…

    And, according to the FDA: “The reports about memory loss, forgetfulness and confusion span all statin products and all age groups. Egan [the FDA “expert”] says these experiences are rare but that those affected often report feeling “fuzzy” or unfocused in their thinking.”

    So fuzzy and unfocussed that some elderly statin users are being mis-diagnosed and treated as having senile dementia or even Alzheimer’s ? Maybe even being prescribed drugs based on such a misdiagnosis? Or worse yet, that someone might become so confused that they find themselves forced out of their home and into a “care facility”?

    I would hate to think that such a tragic mis-diagnosis could happen, but anecdotal reports of this are becoming more common with each passing day. And if the FDA is forcing drug makers to warn users about this it certainly must be more than “just” anecdotal reports – it must be a real thing.

    So, where is the “hard evidence” that statins cause memory or cognition problems? Good Question! In reviewing the medical literature it’s almost impossible to find anything – nary a study, an article, a case review – that is critical of statin drugs. Even those articles that report less-than-favorable effects from statin use do so in the most mild, weasel-worded way possible – as if the authors are terrified of incurring the wrath of Big Pharma for criticizing what has become one of the biggest cash cows in modern history.

    In fact, you can find citations (medical and scientific articles or references) that actually try to make a case for statins improving mental function in elderly people! Digging a little deeper into those articles usually finds that 1.) the evidence for improvement is weak at best and 2.) either the “study” was funded directly by a drug company or the authors of the study had significant ties to and support from Big Pharma. This tends to make my B.S. warning light flash… (B.S. means Bad Science folks!)

    But once away from the “conventional” scientific and medical literature where Big Pharma is in control there are plenty of stories about people becoming confused or losing their memory after starting on statins. There are even carefully researched studies reporting problems that Big Pharma seems all too eager to silence.

    Consider Dr. Duane Graveline – a former NASA astronaut and physician. Graveline experienced first-hand the devastating effects of statin drugs when after taking a relatively low dose of a statin drug for a short while he experienced an episode of total global amnesia, losing his memory for several hours. After he recovered from that episode, regaining his memory, his doctors convinced him that he should try the statin drugs once again, claiming that the memory loss couldn’t possibly be caused by the drugs. He did, and promptly experienced another episode of amnesia.

    Dr. Graveline recovered from that second episode as well and has gone on to research the ill effects of statins, writing books and authoring research papers. For anyone with an interest in the dangers of statins his website – www.SpaceDoc.com – is a “must visit” that offers a wealth of otherwise suppressed information.

    And That’s Not All, Folks!

    In addition to the new warnings about memory loss and confusion that the FDA has been forced to require drug makers to put on their information sheets (the ones that nobody bothers to read anyway…) they have also been forced to admit to some other problems that statins are causing.

    Nothing serious mind you, just little things like Type II diabetes, liver failure, muscle damage

    But don’t worry says the FDA – these problems are “rare.” Never mind that one of the most important muscles in your body and one that’s highly susceptible to statin-induced “damage’ is your heart… or that you only get one liver, or that Type II diabetes is no laughing matter either…

    Those little, “rare” problems are something we’ll talk about in upcoming HealthBeat articles…

     

    Additional reading:

    FDA Consumer Information: FDA Expands Advice on Statin Risks
    http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm293330.htm

    FDA Drug Safety Communication: Important safety label changes to cholesterol-lowering statin drugs
    http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm293101.htm

    Dangers of Statin Drugs: What You Haven’t Been Told About Popular Cholesterol-Lowering Medicines           
    Sally Fallon and Mary G. Enig, PhD
    http://www.westonaprice.org/cardiovascular-disease/dangers-of-statin-drugs

    Padala KP, Padala PR, Potter JF.Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Oct;40(10):1880-3. Epub 2006 Aug 29. Simvastatin-induced decline in cognition. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16940411
    CASE SUMMARY:
    A 64-year-old man developed cognitive difficulties within one week after starting simvastatin 40 mg/day. There was a 3 point decline from baseline in the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) score 2 weeks after simvastatin was initiated, as well as declines in the Activities of Daily Living and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scales. Simvastatin was discontinued, and the patient’s cognition improved to baseline within 6 weeks. Rechallenge with simvastatin at half the original dose was attempted. His cognition deteriorated over a 2 week period. Simvastatin was stopped, and the patient’s MMSE scores returned to baseline within 4 weeks.
    CONCLUSIONS:
    Statins are commonly used in the older population. Simvastatin appeared to be associated with worsened cognition in our patient, an older person with preexisting memory problems. Statins should be used with caution in this vulnerable population.

    Orsi A, Sherman O, Woldeselassie Z. Pharmacotherapy. 2001 Jun;21(6):767-9. Simvastatin-associated memory loss. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11401190
    Abstract
    The statins are widely used to treat dyslipidemias. They are generally associated with mild adverse effects, but rarely, more serious reactions may occur. A 51-year-old man experienced delayed-onset, progressive memory loss while receiving simvastatin for hypercholesterolemia. His therapy was switched to pravastatin, and memory loss resolved gradually over the next month, with no recurrence of the adverse effect.

    Benito-León J, Louis ED, Vega S, Bermejo-Pareja F. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;21(1):95-102. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-100180.
    Statins and cognitive functioning in the elderly: a population-based study. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20413854
    Source
    The Department of Neurology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
    In this population-based sample, elderly participants treated with statins and untreated controls performed similarly in all tested cognitive areas. These results do not support a positive benefit of statins on cognition.

    Galatti L, Polimeni G, Salvo F, Romani M, Sessa A, Spina E. Pharmacotherapy. 2006 Aug;26(8):1190-2. Short-term memory loss associated with rosuvastatin. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16863497
    Abstract
    Memory loss and cognitive impairment have been reported in the literature in association with several 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins), but we found no published case reports associated with rosuvastatin. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of rosuvastatin-related short-term memory loss. A 53-year-old Caucasian man with hypercholesterolemia experienced memory loss after being treated with rosuvastatin 10 mg/day. He had no other concomitant conditions or drug therapies. After discontinuation of rosuvastatin, the neuropsychiatric adverse reaction resolved gradually, suggesting a probable drug association. During the following year, the patient remained free from neuropsychiatric disturbances. Clinicians should be aware of possible adverse cognitive reactions during statin therapy, including rosuvastatin.

    http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=its-not-dementia-its-your-heart-medication
    Newsmagazine Scientific American
    It’s Not Dementia, It’s Your Heart Medication: Cholesterol Drugs and Memory
    One day in 1999 Duane Graveline, then a 68-year-old former NASA astronaut, returned home from his morning walk in Merritt Island, Fla., and could not remember where he was. His wife stepped outside, and he greeted her as a stranger. When Graveline’s memory returned some six hours later in the hospital, he racked his brain to figure out what might have caused this terrifying bout of amnesia. Only one thing came to mind: he had recently started taking the statin drug Lipitor.

    http://www.spacedoc.com/662_cases_memory_loss
    Duane Graveline MD MPH, Jay S. Cohen MD. ATORVASTATIN-ASSOCIATED MEMORY LOSS: ANALYSIS OF 662 CASES  OF COGNITIVE DAMAGE REPORTED TO MEDWATCH
    In 2001, King and colleagues described 2 patients who presented with cognitive impairment (2, 3). The first patient was a 67 year old Caucasian woman with hypertension, dyslipidemia, hypothyroidism and diabetes, who presented with changes in behavioral characterized by mood alterations, lack of interest in routine activities, diminished short term memory (demonstrated on mental status examination), and social impairment. Two months prior to this visit, atorvastatin 10 mg/day was increased to 20 mg/day. The patient had been previously controlled on atorvastatin 10 mg/day without experiencing any adverse events for one year. Atorvastatin was discontinued, but no changes were made to her other concurrent medications, which included levothyroxine, hormone replacement therapy, glyburide and metoprolol. After discontinuation of atorvastatin, the patient reported dramatic improvement in mood, memory and motivation. Repeat mental status examination also demonstrated marked improvement in short term memory. AT 6 months post discontinuation, the patient had experienced no additional impairment.

    The second patient (3) was a 68 year old Caucasian woman with hypertension who was being treated long term with lisinopril, estradiol and atenolol. Her initial evaluation revealed uncontrolled hypertension, hyperlipedemia and an intact memory and judgment and insight. As a result, hydroclothiazide and atorvastatin 10 mg/day were added to her current drug regimen. Approximately 9 months after this initial visit, the patient’s daughter reported noticeable memory impairment, cognitive decline and behavioral changes. The patient was forgetting scheduled routine social events and appointments and neglecting her longstanding exercise program. The patient discontinued atorvastatin on her own, and cognitive improvement was reported in 1 week.

    One month after resolution of symptoms, the patient was re challenged with atorvastatin; the cognitive impairment returned three weeks later. Atorvastatin was a again discontinued and 1 month later the patient reported improvement in memory. Mental status examination demonstrated a return to baseline. Simvastatin 20 mg/day was initiated and, 7 weeks the patient and her daughter reported a return of the memory impairment and cognitive decline. Three weeks after discontinuing simvastatin, these symptoms resolved.

    CONCLUSION
    1) The 662 Medwatch cases of atorvastatin-associated cognitive impairment suggests a causal linkage between the drug and the reported events.  Random analysis of the Medwatch reports demonstrated a high frequency of cases that were definite or probable, thereby adding weight to the possibility of a causal connection between atorvastatin and cognitive impairments.
    2) Accepted reporting rates to Medwatch of drug-related adverse events is 2.5 to 5%.  Golomb et al. suggest it may be even lower with statin-associated adverse events.  If 2.5% of atorvastatin-associated cognitive impairments are reported to Medwatch, then our 662 cases become 26,480 from 1997 through 2006.  If 1% of cases are reported to Medwatch, then 66,200 cases of atorvastatin-associated cognitive impairments may have occurred.
    3) Statin impairment of glial cell synthesis of cholesterol is most likely mechanism but others must be considered.
    4) There is reasonable research evidence that 100% of statin users suffer some cognitive deficit that is not evident to them.

  • The Surgeon And The Mechanic

    An auto mechanic was removing the cylinder heads from the motor of a car when he spotted the famous heart surgeon in his shop waiting for the service manager to look at his car.

    The mechanic shouted across the garage, “Hey Doctor! Come over here for a minute.”

    The heart surgeon, a bit surprised, walked over to the mechanic.

    The mechanic straightened up, wiped his hands on a rag and asked argumentatively, “So doctor, look at this. I also open hearts, take valves out, grind ’em, put in new parts, and when I’m finished this will work like new.

    So how come you get the big money, when you and me is doing basically the same work? ”

    The doctor leaned over and whispered to the mechanic…

    He said: “Try doing it when the engine is running”.