Category: Family Health

  • Winter Immune-Boosting: Beyond The Basics

    Winter is just around the corner and so is cold and flu season. Kids are back in school sharing colds, flu, and assorted cooties, then bringing them home to family. But it’s not just kids.

    The person you just shook hands with, that cougher next to you in the waiting room, the restaurant menu or salt shaker you just handled…

    It’s a harsh world out there and unless you lock yourself away for the winter (is that really possible?), it’s time to ramp up your immunity and fend off the cooties in order to protect yourself from the onslaught of seasonal viruses.

    Here’s what I recommend:

    First things First: “The Basics.”

    1.) A Daily Multiple Vitamin. Deficiency of even one single vitamin, mineral or trace mineral can leave chinks in your "immune armor." The best way to prevent this is to take an optimal dose daily "multi" like my Maxi Multi. If you’re not taking Maxi Multi, be sure that whatever formula you take provides optimal doses of vitamins, minerals and trace minerals. Compare labels. Take the full recommended amount, every day. Here’s a link to recommended optimal doses.

    Optimal doses mean that you’ll be taking at least 6 caps per day to get everything your body needs. Studies show that "one-a-days" are worthless for boosting immunity. “Pixie dust” doses of nutrients — one or two caps per day multiples — don’t do anything except prevent the most severe deficiency diseases like scurvy. They won’t help keep your immune system beefed up during cold and flu season. Please see The Myth Of The One-A-Day Multiple Vitamin

    2.) Fish Oil. (Essential Fatty Acids EPA & DHA). Remember the old-timey daily dose of cod liver oil that Mom insisted on? (Some of you are way too young to recall this). It tasted pretty bad but Mom was on the right track, it was good for you. Cod liver oil contains the essential fatty acids DHA and studies show that it enhances B cell activity (a type of white blood cell).

    Too little essential fatty acids in the diet causes excess inflammation and is related to a number (about 60) diseases. That, plus immunity is enhanced when EFA levels are increased.

    Maxi Marine provides 400mg EPA and 300mg DHA in a softgel capsule. No fishy taste, no fishy burps.

    Those are the basics you should be taking all year long to keep yourself healthy, prevent disease and keep your immune system strong. If you’re not taking the basics, the “add-ons” don’t make much sense. Our "Maxi Health Bundle" is a great value for these getting these important “basics.”

    After you’ve got your “basic bases” covered, there’s more you can do to boost your immunity.

    Here are the Immune-Boosting additions I recommend.

    1.) Dr. Myatt’s Immune System Support. This formula contains the best-proven immune enhancing herbs known: Astragalus, Ligustrum, Echinacea, a full spectrum of Medicinal Mushrooms and additional immune supporting nutrients. This is one of the most potent formulas for ramping up your immune system for the season.

    2.) Vitamin D Winter in North America means colder weather, less sunshine and less Vitamin D. Low vitamin D levels are associated with higher risk of heart disease, cancer, autoimmune disease and all-cause mortality!

    Relative to immune function, higher rates of upper respiratory tract infections, influenza and tuberculosis are seen in those who are vitamin D deficient. Hint: even folks who live here in Phoenix AZ are testing low in vitamin D. Deficiencies are widespread. (24,30,38)

    Vitamin D is so important that we’ve written an entire white paper on the subject. You can get your free copy of this here: Vitamin D Special Report

    OK, so you’ve done a good job in strengthening your immune system with a quality daily multiple like Maxi Multi, Essential Fatty Acids from a fish oil supplement like Maxi Marine, added immune enhancing herbs and vitamin D. Great! But what about that menu you just handled? The door knob you just touched? (the one that a 284 other people recently touched) Do you suppose there might have been a bacteria or virus or two on that maybe?

    Handwashing – frequent handwashing –after every time you touch something you are not sure of is the best defense. But is that really practical? But that’s why you carry a little bottle of hand sanitizer, right? Hand sanitizer ISN’T good protection – it’s not “persistent.” Hand sanitizers clean and protect only for the instant they are used – the antibacterial effect doesn’t last or “persist” beyond that moment. The next time you touch something with cooties, you’ve re-contaminated yourself.

    But wait – I said “most” are not persistent. There is one common hand sanitizer that is persistent. It contains triclosan, a pesticide. As much as I want to keep my hands clean, I’m not willing to use a toxic chemical to do so. But hey, that’s just me.

    There is another non-toxic, persistent antimicrobial. It is so safe, it is used medically to treat wound and burns (skin as sensitive as it gets). The magic elixir? Silver Gel. Carry a tube in your pocket or purse and use it as you would any toxic hand sanitizer, with the comfort of knowing that the antimicrobial effects last long after the you apply it. Learn more about Silver Gel here:

    Finally, if after all your protective measures, you still start to “feel something,” pull out a Super Hero: Selenium. It’s our secret weapon cold and flu buster.

    Nothing works all the time, not even medical “first sign of the flu” shots. But for us and our patients, it works far more often than not.

    At the first hint of prodromal (earliest, faintest) symptoms, take 5 capsules of selenium 200 mcg. You can repeat the dose for several days if needed. This is higher than a recommended daily supplement dose but don’t worry, you won’t overdose at this level when taken for just a few days.

    Do you have all these on hand? Immune Support, Vitamin D, Silver Gel hand sanitizer, and Selenium? Get them now. How can you take selenium “at the first sign of something” if you don’t have any in the house? As for the “preventives,” it’s best to get an early start on the season. I personally started my “immune ramp up” the beginning of October.

    ImmuneBundleTo encourage you to DO THIS, we’re offering you an “Immune kit” at an unprecedented 20% off, good for the next two weeks only. (Because I want you to get with the program and avoid potential seasonal suffering).

    Purchased separately, these supplements would cost $64, but for the next 2 weeks only, a package of the 4 essential “anti-ick” supplements – Dr. Myatt’s immune support, Vitamin D 5000, Silver Gel hand Sanitizer, and last resort Selenium – for only $51. That’s over 20% off the kit of 4 “no flu for you” items and a great way to be prepared for cold and flu season. Each package is a one month supply for one person, so order accordingly. Sale ends November 15th.

    This special offer is available ONLY to our HealthBeat News readers – you won’t find it listed on our website, and it absolutely ends in two weeks. Grab it now so I won’t hear you singin’ the blues about having a cold, or the flu, or bronchitis, or pneumonia…

    Click here to order your Immune Kits:

     

    REFERENCES

    1.) Autier P, Gandini S. Vitamin D supplementation and total mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(16):1730-1737.
    2.) Thomas L. Lenz. Vitamin D Supplementation and Cancer Prevention. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2009;3(5):365-368.
    3.) Pilz S, Dobnig H, Nijpels G, Heine RJ, Stehouwer CD, Snijder MB, van Dam RM, Dekker JM. Vitamin D and mortality in older men and women. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009 Nov;71(5):666-72. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
    4.) Ginde AA, Scragg R, Schwartz RS, Camargo CA Jr. Prospective study of serum 25-hydroxyVitamin D level, cardiovascular disease mortality, and all-cause mortality in older U.S. adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Sep;57(9):1595-603. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
    5.) Melamed ML, Michos ED, Post W, Astor B.25-hydroxyVitamin D levels and the risk of mortality in the general population. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Aug 11;168(15):1629-37.
    6.) Ginde AA, Mansbach JM, Camargo CA Jr. Association between serum 25-hydroxyVitamin D level and upper respiratory tract infection in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Feb 23;169(4):384-90.
    7.) Eric A. Gurzell, Heather Teague, Mitchel Harris, Jonathan Clinthorne, Saame Raza Shaikh, and Jenifer I. Fenton. DHA-enriched fish oil targets B cell lipid microdomains and enhances in vivo and ex vivo B cell function. J Leukoc Biol April 2013 93:463-470
    8.) Clement-Kruzel S, Hwang SA, Kruzel MC, Dasgupta A, Actor JK. Immune modulation of macrophage pro-inflammatory response by goldenseal and Astragalus extracts. J Med Food. 2008 Sep;11(3):493-8.
    9.) Schoop R, Klein P, Suter A, Johnston SL.Echinacea in the prevention of induced rhinovirus colds: a meta-analysis. Clin Ther. 2006 Feb;28(2):174-83.
    10.) Giles JT, Palat CT 3rd, Chien SH, Chang ZG, Kennedy DT. Evaluation of echinacea for treatment of the common cold. Pharmacotherapy. 2000 Jun;20(6):690-7.
    11.) Abdullah T.A strategic call to utilize Echinacea-garlic in flu-cold seasons.J Natl Med Assoc. 2000 Jan;92(1):48-51.
    12.) See DM, Broumand N, Sahl L, Tilles JG. In vitro effects of echinacea and ginseng on natural killer and antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity in healthy subjects and chronic fatigue syndrome or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients. Immunpharmacol 1997;35:229–35.
    13.) Leuttig B, Steinmuller C, Gifford GE, et al. Macrophage activation by the polysaccharide arabinogalactan isolated from plant cell cultures of Echinacea purpurea. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;81:669–75.
    14.) Melchart D, Linde K, Worku F, et al. Immunomodulation with Echinacea—a systematic review of controlled clinical trials. Phytomedicine 1994;1:245–54.
    15.) Dorn M, Knick E, Lewith G. Placebo-controlled, double-blind study of Echinacea pallida redix in upper respiratory tract infections. Comp Ther Med 1997;5:40–2.
    16.) Hoheisel O, Sandberg M, Bertram S, et al. Echinacea shortens the course of the common cold: a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Eur J Clin Res 1997;9:261–8.
    17.) Braunig B, Dorn M, Knick E. Echinacea purpurea root for strengthening the immune response to flu-like infections. Zeitschrift Phytotherapie 1992;13:7–13.
    18.) Brikenborn RM, Shah DV, Degenring FH. Echinaforce® and other Echinacea fresh plant preparations in the treatment of the common cold. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Phytomedicine 1999;6:1–5.
    19.) Cho WC, Leung KN. In vitro and in vivo anti-tumor effects of Astragalus membranaceus. Cancer Lett. 2007 Jul 8;252(1):43-54. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
    20.) Cho WC, Leung KN. In vitro and in vivo immunomodulating and immunorestorative effects of Astragalus membranaceus. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007 Aug 15;113(1):132-41. Epub 2007 May 31.
    21.) Wang MS, Li J, Di HX, Li ZL, Yang SL, Hou W, Yan JY, Zhao XM. Clinical study on effect of Astragalus Injection and its immuno-regulation action in treating chronic aplastic anemia.Chin J Integr Med. 2007 Jun;13(2):98-102.
    22.) Xu HD, You CG, Zhang RL, Gao P, Wang ZR.Xu HD, You CG, Zhang RL, Gao P, Wang ZR. J Int Med Res. 2007 Jan-Feb;35(1):84-90.
    23.) Klepser T, Nisly N. Astragalus as an adjunctive therapy in immunocompromised patients. Alt Med Alert 1999;Nov:125–8 [review].
    24.) Qun L, Luo Q, Zhang ZY, et al. Effects of astragalus on IL-2/IL-2R system in patients with maintained hemodialysis. Clin Nephrol 1999;52:333–4 [letter].
    25.) Tang W, Eisenbrand G. Chinese Drugs of Plant Origin. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1992, 1056.
    26.) Nanba H, Hamaguchi AM, Kuroda H. The chemical structure of an antitumor polysaccharide in fruit bodies of Grifola frondosa (maitake). Chem Pharm Bull 1987;35:1162–8.
    27.) Yamada Y, Nanba H, Kuroda H. Antitumor effect of orally administered extracts from fruit body of Grifola frondosa (maitake). Chemotherapy 1990;38:790–6.
    28.) Nanba H. Immunostimulant activity in vivo and anti-HIV activity in vitro of 3 branched b-1–6-glucans extracted from maitake mushrooms (Grifola frondosa). VIII International Conference on AIDS, Amsterdam, 1992 [abstract].
    29.) Shams-Ghahfarokhi M, Shokoohamiri MR, Amirrajab N, Moghadasi B, Ghajari A, Zeini F, Sadeghi G, Razzaghi-Abyaneh M. In vitro antifungal activities of Allium cepa, Allium sativum and ketoconazole against some pathogenic yeasts and dermatophytes. Fitoterapia. 2006 Jun;77(4):321-3. Epub 2006 May 11.
    30.) Tessema B, Mulu A, Kassu A, Yismaw G. An in vitro assessment of the antibacterial effect of garlic (Allium sativum) on bacterial isolates from wound infections. Ethiop Med J. 2006 Oct;44(4):385-9.
    31.) Pyun MS, Shin S.Antifungal effects of the volatile oils from Allium plants against Trichophyton species and synergism of the oils with ketoconazole. Phytomedicine. 2006 Jun;13(6):394-400. Epub 2005 Nov 2.
    32.) Bakri IM, Douglas CW.Inhibitory effect of garlic extract on oral bacteria. Arch Oral Biol. 2005 Jul;50(7):645-51. Epub 2005 Feb 5.
    33.) Bjarnsholt T, Jensen PØ, Rasmussen TB, Christophersen L, Calum H, Hentzer M, Hougen HP, Rygaard J, Moser C, Eberl L, Høiby N, Givskov M.Garlic blocks quorum sensing and promotes rapid clearing of pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Microbiology. 2005 Dec;151(Pt 12):3873-80.
    34.) Dikasso D, Lemma H, Urga K, Debella A, Addis G, Tadele A, Yirsaw K. Investigation on the antibacterial properties of garlic (Allium sativum) on pneumonia causing bacteria. Ethiop Med J. 2002 Jul;40(3):241-9.
    35.) Josling P. Preventing the common cold with a garlic supplement: a double-blind, placebo-controlled survey.Adv Ther. 2001 Jul-Aug;18(4):189-93.
    35.) Kumar M, Berwal JS. Sensitivity of food pathogens to garlic (Allium sativum). J Appl Microbiol. 1998 Feb;84(2):213-5.
    37.) Gomaa NF, Hashish MH.The inhibitory effect of garlic (Allium sativum) on growth of some microorganisms. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2003;78(5-6):361-72.
    38.) Dankert J, Tromp TF, de Vries H, Klasen HJ. Antimicrobial activity of crude juices of Allium ascalonicum, Allium cepa and Allium sativum. Zentralbl Bakteriol [Orig A]. 1979 Oct;245(1-2):229-39.
    39.) Wintergerst ES, Maggini S, Hornig DH. Contribution of selected vitamins and trace elements to immune function. Ann Nutr Metab.2007;51(4):301-23. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
    40.) Wintergerst ES, Maggini S, Hornig DH. Contribution of selected vitamins and trace elements to immune function. Ann Nutr Metab. 2007;51(4):301-23. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
    41.) Romieu I. Nutrition and lung health. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005 Apr;9(4):362-74.
    42.) Mora JR, Iwata M, von Andrian UH. Vitamin effects on the immune system: vitamins A and D take centre stage. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008 Aug 8. [Epub ahead of print]
    43.) Molina EL, Patel JA. A to Z: vitamin A and zinc, the miracle duo.Indian J Pediatr. 1996 Jul-Aug;63(4):427-31.
    44.) Sasazuki S, Sasaki S, Tsubono Y, Okubo S, Hayashi M, Tsugane S.Effect of vitamin C on common cold: randomized controlled trial.Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006 Jan;60(1):9-17.
    45.) Van Straten M, Josling P. Preventing the common cold with a vitamin C supplement: a double-blind, placebo-controlled survey. Adv Ther. 2002 May-Jun;19(3):151-9.
    46.) Carr AB, Einstein R, Lai LY, Martin NG, Starmer GA. Vitamin C and the common cold: using identical twins as controls. Med J Aust. 1981 Oct 17;2(8):411-2.
    47.) Anderson TW, Beaton GH, Corey P, Spero L. Winter illness and vitamin C: the effect of relatively low doses. Can Med Assoc J. 1975 Apr 5;112(7):823-6.
    48.) Romieu I. Nutrition and lung health. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005 Apr;9(4):362-74.
    49.) Wintergerst ES, Maggini S, Hornig DH. Immune-enhancing role of vitamin C and zinc and effect on clinical conditions. Ann Nutr Metab. 2006;50(2):85-94. Epub 2005 Dec 21.
    50.) High KP. Nutritional strategies to boost immunity and prevent infection in elderly individuals. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Dec 1;33(11):1892-900. Epub 2001 Oct 25.
    51.) Girodon F, Galan P, Monget AL, Boutron-Ruault MC, Brunet-Lecomte P, Preziosi P, Arnaud J, Manuguerra JC, Herchberg S. Impact of trace elements and vitamin supplementation on immunity and infections in institutionalized elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. MIN. VIT. AOX. geriatric network. Arch Intern Med. 1999 Apr 12;159(7):748-54.
    52.) Romieu I. Nutrition and lung health. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005 Apr;9(4):362-74.
    53.) Pilz S, Dobnig H, Nijpels G, Heine RJ, Stehouwer CD, Snijder MB, van Dam RM, Dekker JM. Vitamin D and mortality in older men and women. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009 Nov;71(5):666-72. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
    54.) Ginde AA, Scragg R, Schwartz RS, Camargo CA Jr. Prospective study of serum 25-hydroxyVitamin D level, cardiovascular disease mortality, and all-cause mortality in older U.S. adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Sep;57(9):1595-603. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
    55.) Annweiler C, Schott AM, Allali G, Bridenbaugh SA, Kressig RW, Allain P, Herrmann FR, Beauchet O. Association of Vitamin D deficiency with cognitive impairment in older women: cross-sectional study. Neurology. 2010 Jan 5;74(1):27-32. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
    56.) Galdiero S, Falanga A, Vitiello M, Cantisani M, Marra V, Galdiero M., Department of Experimental Medicine, II University of Naples, Via De Crecchio 7, 80138, Naples, Italy. sgaldier@unina.it, Silver nanoparticles as potential antiviral agents.Molecules. 2011 Oct 24;16(10):8894-918.
    57.) Jain J, Arora S, Rajwade JM, Omray P, Khandelwal S, Paknikar KM. Centre for Nanobioscience, Agharkar Research Institute, India. Silver nanoparticles in therapeutics: development of an antimicrobial gel formulation for topical use. Mol Pharm. 2009 Sep-Oct;6(5):1388-401.
    58.) Franco-Molina MA, Mendoza-Gamboa E, Sierra-Rivera CA, Gómez-Flores RA, Zapata-Benavides P, Castillo-Tello P, Alcocer-González JM, Miranda-Hernández DF, Tamez-Guerra RS, Rodríguez-Padilla C., Laboratorio de Inmunología y Virología, Departamento de Microbiología e Inmunología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, San Nicolás de los Garza, N, L, México. Antitumor activity of colloidal silver on MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Nov 16;29:148.
    59.)
    http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/REDs/factsheets/triclosan_fs.htm
    60.) Robin E. Dodson, Marcia Nishioka, Laurel J. Standley, Laura J. Perovich, Julia Green Brody, and Ruthann A. Rudel, Endocrine Disruptors and Asthma-Associated Chemicals in Consumer Products, Environ Health Perspect. 2012 July; 120(7): 935–943. Published online 2012 March 8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404651/
    61) Steinbrenner H, Al-Quraishy S, Dkhil MA, Wunderlich F, Sies H. Dietary selenium in adjuvant therapy of viral and bacterial infections. Adv Nutr. 2015 Jan 15;6(1):73-82.
    62.) Beck MA. Selenium and vitamin E status: impact on viral pathogenicity. J Nutr. 2007 May;137(5):1338-40.
    63.) Levander OA, Beck MA. Selenium and viral virulence. Br Med Bull. 1999;55(3):528-33.
    64.) Beck MA, Levander OA, Handy J. Selenium deficiency and viral infection. J Nutr. 2003 May;133(5 Suppl 1):1463S-7S.

  • How Do YOU Get Clean Hands?

    By Nurse Mark

     

    It may be summertime as this is written, but fall and back-to-school and cold and flu season are just around the corner.

    There is no question that hygiene, as in hand washing, goes a long way toward preventing the spread of colds and flu.

    But what is best? It’s really not practical to wash hands as often as we should – like after every time we touch anything that anyone else could have possibly touched…

    So, what about the ubiquitous "hand sanitizers" that contain ‘antibacterial" ingredients?

    Is there anything else? Maybe something better, or at least a more effective strategy?

    There is no doubt that good ‘ol soap and water is king when it comes to controlling the spread of disease-causing microorganisms – germs, viruses, fungal spores, you-name-it; they all are out to get us.

    A good brisk soap and hot water scrub removes visible dirt, and either removes or attenuates or kills a very wide variety of baddies.

    But there are some problems:

    The "clean" doesn’t last – it is not ‘persistent." The instant you touch anything with those nice clean hands there is a strong likelihood that they are not so clean anymore. That’s why when you see depictions of surgeons "scrubbing for surgery" they engage in such gyrations to avoid touching anything unsterile with those nice clean hands: turning off the taps with an elbow, holding hands up to await a sterile towel to dry, and then carefully donning sterile gloves.

    Surgeons know that they can get their hands squeaky clean with soap and water, but if they touch anything not known to be sterile then all bets are off and they have to start all over.

    Soap and water is good, but it can be hard on the skin – very drying and often irritating – just as any surgeon, or nurse, or anyone who must scrub many times in a day. "Dishpan hands” is a very real thing…

    What about "Hand Sanitizers"? After all, the ads for them make it sound like they are the answer to our prayers. Gels, sprays, liquids, foams, all claiming to be "the best."

    Well, some may be better than others – but they all work the same way: they contain some sort of antibacterial/antimicrobial/virucidal ingredient.

    Most commonly that ingredient is good ol’ alcohol. Cheap and effective, alcohol has been used as a disinfectant for as long as man has known about alcohol.

    Alcohol disinfects by denaturing proteins. It may be effective, but it must be in contact with pathogens for longer periods of time (i.e.: up to 20 minutes or more) to be really any more effective than soap and hot water and scrubbing. Isopropyl alcohol is thought to be more effective than ethanol.

    So, for a quick "spritz ‘n’ rub" skin cleanse, maybe not so effective- who is going to soak their hands in it for even 2 minutes, much less 20 minutes? But for a quickie hand cleanse when nothing else is available? Better than nothing!

    Further, alcohol can be very drying and irritating to the skin, and if you have any little breaks in the skin (Paper cut anyone? Hangnail?) you’ll know all about it!

    Oh, and by the way: alcohol is highly flammable… yep, people have set themselves alight with their hand sanitizers!

    What about non-alcohol sanitizers?

    A new kid on the block is actually an old name in the antimicrobial business: Benzalkonium chloride. I’s main claim to fame is that it is "persistent": that it’s antimicrobial effects continue for some time after it’s application because the chemical remains on and in the skin.

    A synthetic chemical in the family of quaternary ammonium cations (also known as quats) Benzalkonium Chloride is a fairly effective disinfectant found in a number of "non-alcohol" hand sanitizer products. It has also long been used in medical settings as a disinfectant soak for such things as oral thermometers and instruments.

    Benzalkonium chloride is effective against gram positive (such as Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumonia – “staph” and “strep”) and some gram negative bacteria (e-coli, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas) and some viruses, fungi, and protozoa.

    It is effective, but also toxic – benzalkonium chloride is considered to be  highly toxic to fish, very highly toxic to aquatic invertebrates, moderately toxic to birds, and slightly toxic to mammals. Keep it away from your aquarium and your pet birds!

    There is also a growing body of evidence that long term human exposure to benzalkonium chloride and related chemicals is associated with significant health risks. These include asthma, chronic dermatitis and other immune system disorders. They are no longer recommended for use around infants or children, and their safety in the elderly is being called into question.

    Also becoming popular as a non-alcohol sanitizer is another old friend, triclosan.

    Triclosan was first registered with the EPA as a pesticide in 1969 and While it is effective as an antimicrobial, it is being found to have thyroid and hormone-disruptive effects.

    Triclosan-containing hand cleansers also boast of their "persistence" – meaning that this chemical stays on the skin after being applied. Hmmm… this sounds like a good thing; it continues to protect for a period of time after use. But it also means that this toxic chemical – originally developed as a pesticide – is being allowed to remain in contact with your skin for an extended period of time. And your skin is the largest absorptive organ of your body… Oops…

    Is there nothing really effective and safe?

    We think that there is: Silver – “colloidal silver”

    We have praised the effectiveness and safety of silver before: see our article “Is There A ‘Silver Bullet’ For Disease?” to learn more.

    Colloidal silver is highly effective, and persistent if allowed to remain on surfaces. We have written often in praise of the benefits of colloidal silver. It is usually not recommended for generalized cleaning as there are more economical choices – though there are researchers who have verified it’s effectiveness as a general surface disinfectant.

    But in a hand sanitizer colloidal silver is highly effective against a very wide range of bacteria, viruses, and even fungi, and silver-containing gel formulations soothe and heal damaged skin. Since the colloidal silver is rubbed into the skin and not washed off, it has very good "persistence."

    We offer our version of a "Hand sanitizer" that we feel is both safe for frequent use, and is highly effective.

    ASAP 365 – 24 ppm Silver Gel is effective, safe, and inexpensive – Dr. Myatt and I carry this with us whenever we travel and use it often – and we don’t use chemical-laden “hand sanitizers”! Colloidal silver is safe even for internal use – there are some people who use this as "toothpaste" and swear by it!

    This gel rubs in quickly and easily, is non-greasy, and contains no perfumes or dangerous chemicals. It is a valuable addition to a natural first-aid kit for treating minor burns, wounds, fungal and bacterial infections – there are even those who swear by colloidal silver for the treatment of “Cold Sores” and “Fever Blisters”, and scientific research supports their belief in it’s effectiveness. One ecstatic customer even wrote to tell of it’s effectiveness as a deodorant!

    So, the short course on clean hands?

    1. Soap and water as often as possible and practical – and don’t forget to do the "surgeon thing" using a paper tower to shut off the water and to open the door so that you aren’t touching possibly (likely) contaminated surfaces with those nice clean hands.
    2. Colloidal silver-containing hand sanitizer immediately after that soap and water hand scrub – you got them clean, now use the silver to make sure of it and to provide that valuable "persistence" that will help protect you when you inevitably touch something that dozens, hundreds, even thousands of people have touched and contaminated before you. (door handle? menu? escalator hand rail? you get the idea…)
    3. Avoid the toxic chemical laden "alcohol-free" hand sanitizers. An alcohol-based hand sanitizer may be useful when hand washing is not an option – just use it liberally to ‘clean’ and then follow up with a colloidal silver gel sanitizer for persistent effects.
  • Lutein… Eye Can See Clearly Now (The Haze Is Gone)

    By Nurse Mark

     

    HealthBeat News readers may not know that I will be turning 60 this year, so there it is – my age, now known to all. And I feel that I’m in pretty good shape for being almost 60; I run every morning, I do daily body-weight exercise, I eat well, I sleep well, I take my vitamins faithfully, I’m a normal weight and I feel good.

    Like many people my age however I like to joke that “if I’d known I would live this long I would have taken better care of myself!”

    When we are in our 20’s and 30’s we are immortal, invincible. But as we move into our 40’s and 50’s and begin to notice little things we wish we had been more careful, more attentive.

    As I moved through my 40’s I began to notice that my arms seemed to be becoming shorter – I was having to hold printed materials further from my eyes in order to focus and read. As I approached my 50’s a set of “cheaters” – non-prescription reading glasses – became my constant companion.

    When I was in my 20’s and 30’s I actually preferred driving at night when there was less traffic on the roads – but as I moved into my 40’s I found that it seemed like more people had annoying, glaringly maladjusted headlights, and as I entered my 50’s I found myself going out of my way to avoid night driving – the glare from oncoming headlights seemed blinding and I felt I was not as safe as I wanted to be because of that.

    In my mid-50’s I earned my Private Pilot certificate, which meant learning to fly at night. I found that flying in darkness is a delightful experience. But while takeoffs are optional, landings are mandatory and the glare from the runway edge lights and other airport lighting made night landings a nerve-wracking experience – I found myself avoiding night flight.

    As I entered my 50’s I also noticed that while my distance vision was still quite good, things sometimes looked a little “flat” in some light, and objects were becoming harder to pick out from backgrounds. Colors weren’t quite as “crisp” as I seemed to remember…

    So, around my 59th birthday last year Dr. Myatt and I were attending lectures at a medical conference in Las Vegas. One of those lectures explained the results of the NIH-sponsored AREDS2 study and the actions and effects of the supplements lutein and zeaxanthin. After sitting through what felt like hours of mind-numbing statistics and science the speaker began to get to the meat of the lecture and I started to think that perhaps there was something in it for me – and that since we carry a very high quality lutein supplement perhaps I would give the stuff a try. And so, when we got home from the conference I began to take a lutein supplement faithfully every day – it has been about 90 days now.

    Here is what I found: For the first month or so it didn’t seem to be doing a darned thing.

    Then about halfway through the second month of using it I was out for my usual morning run – a day like any other. As I neared one particular hilltop that affords a nice view of a local valley something seemed different. I stopped and admired the view. Colors felt brighter; distant homes, vehicles, trees, and other features somehow looked more prominent. Everything just seemed crisper, cleaner, like when the air is especially clear after a rainfall. But this is Arizona – we had not experienced any rain for some time. I drank in the beauty of it and continued my run without much more thought.

    A few days later I found myself needing to drive to a meeting at night. I really don’t like to drive at night anymore, but there was no way around it, so off I went. Oddly, though it seemed like there was as much traffic as ever, oncoming headlights weren’t quite as blinding – even the nasty high-intensity blue headlights. Headlights from behind (we have plenty of “jacked-up” trucks and SUV’s in our part of the world) were less annoying too. When I did get an unavoidable flash of headlights in my eyes I seemed to be recovering my vision faster – more like I was able to when I was 20 years younger. My own headlights seemed to be working a bit better too, and I was finding it easier to pick out objects at the edges of their illumination – the car in a dark driveway getting ready to pull out onto the road, the deer feeding in the ditch, the pothole to be avoided. All in all, I found myself enjoying driving at night again – wow!

    The next day I thought about my vision, and about the changes I was noticing. It isn’t like by vision is any better by measurable means – I still need my readers for close work, I don’t think my visual acuity has changed or improved – my distance vision seems unchanged (it was pretty good to begin with).

    What has changed though is the quality of my vision. Would it make sense if I said it feels “cleaner”? Colors seem less muddy. Contrast seems improved. There seems to be less glare. Perhaps there is a way to measure all this that I’m not aware of, but for now it just seems… better. And that’s enough for me.

    But I wasn’t satisfied with that – and so I dug out my notes from that medical conference lecture and reviewed them.

    I found that what I was noticing is exactly what the lecturer said that they had been finding in their research.

    My notes said that 6 to 9 weeks of continued supplementation was required to achieve any noticeable improvement. Check.

    I had noted that lutien forms a protective layer inside the eye that improves night sight and reduces glare effects by blocking blue light. Check.

    And that this blue light blocking effect also improves contrast and color rendition in full and in subdued light. Check.

    My notes also say that lutein is protective of the eye, functions as an antioxidant, and may prevent development and progression of cataracts and may prevent the progression of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

    My Bottom line?

    I believe that using lutein faithfully for the last three months has made a difference to the quality of my vision. Not to my visual acuity: it hasn’t fixed my presbyopia – but has improved a difficult-to-define “quality” of vision.

    Let’s just say that I like what (and how) I’m seeing, and you’re not taking my lutein away from me!

    Learn more about Lutein and Zeaxanthin here:

  • Keeping It Clean!

    Cleanliness is Health!

     

    By Nurse Mark

     

    It’s a scary world right now, with a variety of very nasty infectious bugs out there: Enterovirus, D68, MRSA, H1N1, Ebola…

    Since most of these things really don’t have good “treatments” avoidance is the best strategy for staying safe.

    People ask us for our recommendations for cleaning and sterilizing in order to keep these bug at bay – knowing that we tend to prefer natural solutions to problems like this whenever possible.

    There are dozens, perhaps even hundreds of preparations, products, concoctions, formulas, and protocols that are recommended for disinfection. Many are complicated, expensive, dangerous, or effective only against very specific threats.

    In general, we look for disinfectants that are easy to use, inexpensive, safe for people, pets, and the environment, and of course, effective.

    Here are some of our thoughts on disinfectants for home use:

    Surfactants: I.e.: “Soap and water”

    Simple soap and hot water and scrubbing is highly effective at removing and killing bacteria, virus’ and molds from skin, clothing and fabrics, and hard surfaces.

    Good ol’ soap and water should be considered your “first line of defense” even if you plan to use a more potent disinfectant. For example, some disinfectants (like bleach) are rendered less potent by the presence of protein material – so washing it away with soap and hot water will allow the disinfectant to do it’s job better. This is in fact the protocol suggested by both the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) when dealing with blood and body fluid cleanup.

    Fresh air and sunshine:

    Yes, good old fresh air and sunshine – grandma was right. It’s the ultraviolet radiation in sunshine that does the trick – many microorganisms are killed off by UV radiation. You may have seen a news article recently about a “germ killing robot” – this is actually a machine that is shut into a room and floods the room with a specific frequency of UV light – and yes, it is very effective and very expensive. Sunshine does it for free.

    Acetic acid: AKA Vinegar

    Acetic acid (vinegar) is an effective mycobactericidal disinfectant that is also active against most other bacteria.

    In the US it’s commonly available in 5% acetic acid concentrations in grocery stores. Stronger “pickling vinegar” of 10% may be available and is more useful. Even stronger 15% or 20% may be encountered but is not necessary and can be corrosive and dangerous.

    It is effective against: Mycobacterium tuberculosis and non-M. tuberculosis mycobacteria. Acetic acid (vinegar) efficiently kills M. tuberculosis after 30 min of exposure to a 6% acetic acid solution. M. bolletii and M. massiliense nontuberculous mycobacteria are more resistant, although a 30-min exposure to 10% acetic acid resulted in at least a 6-log10 reduction of viable bacteria. (That’s researcher-speak for “significantly active”")

    The researchers had this to say about acetic acid:

    “The high-level capacity of acetic acid in killing mycobacteria, regarded as the most disinfectant-resistant bacteria due to the structure of their lipid-rich cell walls, suggests that perhaps it should be revived as a broadly effective bactericide that can be used as a general sanitizer.”

    Acetic acid is also effective against e-coli, mold and H1N1 virus.

    Sodium Hypochlorite and sodium hydroxide – AKA “bleach” – (i.e.: Chlorox)

    Bleach is tried and true, inexpensive, and is easily available virtually everywhere. Organizations from the WHO to the CDC all strongly recommend bleach solutions as standard for disinfectants. We concur!

    Bleach is effective against: H1N1 virus (influenza) and other viruses including Ebola, mold, all bacteria  including staphylococcus, streptococcus, E. coli and salmonella.

    So, what’s not to love about bleach?

    Well, it’s toxic – that’s what makes it work so well. But it is quite toxic and dangerous to humans and pets. Bleach can burn skin and mucous membranes very badly, and it is not easy to neutralize when splashed on skin – flooding with water helps, but is still slow to wash away and burns will occur.

    It can be very dangerous if it becomes mixed with other cleaning solutions or chemicals such as ammonia or acetic acid. When this happens large volumes of very toxic fumes can be released. (The fumes from bleach are always toxic anyway!)

    Bleach is a great disinfectant, but it must be used, stored, and handled with caution. It is also not good for those who rely on septic systems as it can damage the beneficial bacteria in those systems.

    The WHO provides information about the use of bleach for disinfection, including instructions for mixing correct solution strengths, here:

    Hydrogen Peroxide – H2O2

    Hydrogen peroxide is commonly and cheaply available as 3% and is useful in that concentration. 5% concentrations may occasionally be found, but should be used with care.

    Stronger concentrations are available, but must be diluted before use. Concentrations stronger than 3% can cause “burns” which are a blanching of the skin due to damage to the capillaries (blood vessels) and can also be quite dangerous to mucous membranes and the eyes so full protective gear – gloves, protective sleeves and apron, and face shield or at least goggles should be worn when mixing solutions.

    Hydrogen peroxide is very useful in the kitchen – it leaves no residue or odor,and is safe to use on food. Numerous experts have promoted a 2-part system of cleaning vegetables before use: a thorough spraying with vinegar, followed by a clear water rinse, and another thorough spraying with hydrogen peroxide which is not rinsed off but allowed to remain. Try using it in a commonly available spray bottle and be aware that it loses it’s potency with exposure to light – which is why it is sold in opaque (dark) bottles.

    Hydrogen peroxide is active against a wide range of microorganisms, including bacteria, yeasts, fungi, viruses, and spores.

    Benzalkonium Chloride:

    This is a fairly effective disinfectant found in several “Lysol” and “Dettol” brand products. It has also long been used in medical settings as a disinfectant soak for such things as oral thermometers and instruments.

    Benzalkonium chloride solutions are effective against gram positive (such as Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumonia – “staph” and “strep”) and some gram negative bacteria (e-coli, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas) and some viruses, fungi, and protozoa.

    It is effective, but also toxic – benzalkonium chloride is considered to be  highly toxic to fish, very highly toxic to aquatic invertebrates, moderately toxic to birds, and slightly toxic to mammals. Keep it away from your aquarium and pet birds!

    Silver – “colloidal silver”

    Colloidal silver is highly effective, and persistent if allowed to remain on surfaces. We have written often in praise of the benefits of colloidal silver. It is usually not recommended for generalized cleaning as there are more economical choices – though there are researchers who have verified it’s effectiveness as a general surface disinfectant.

    When it comes to personal use silver has no equal. A one-two punch, soap and hot water washing followed by the use of silver gel hand sanitizer will do a far better job than the WHO recommended alcohol-based hand sanitizers because the sanitizing effect of silver is persistent while alcohol evaporates and it’s disinfecting effects evaporate with it.

    Read more about silver here: Is There A “Silver Bullet” For Disease?

    Alcohol: Disinfects by denaturing proteins. It may be effective, but it must be in contact with pathogens for longer periods of time (i.e.: up to 20 minutes or more) to be really any more effective than soap and hot water and scrubbing. Isopropyl alcohol is thought to be more effective than ethanol.

    The WHO provides a do-it-yourself recipe for making hand sanitizer with alcohol and hydrogen peroxide – since these things are generally available even in third-world locations.

    Commercially available “hand sanitizers”are usually alcohol-based, though many contain some additional nasty chemicals like the pesticide triclosan and perfumes. Learn more about “hand sanitizers” and your alternatives here: Poisoned With Good Intentions ?

    Alcohol is also highly flammable and yes, that includes alcohol-based hand sanitizers!

    What about other “disinfectants” such as baking soda, tea tree oil, borax, ammonia, and so on? They are not recommended by the CDC as they tend to not be broadly effective – though each might be effective against certain select bacteria.

    Our top choices?

    • Soap and hot water and vigorous scrubbing is number 1 in all circumstances.
    • Bleach is very widely effective when used carefully and allowed to dry on surfaces.
    • Acetic acid – vinegar – is nearly as effective as bleach, and less nasty to use.
    • Hydrogen peroxide is perfect for use on and around food.
    • Silver is our top choice for hand cleansing and shows promise as an additive to surface cleaning solutions since it offers persistence.

     

    Further reading:

    Rutala WA, Barbee SL, Aguiar NC, Sobsey MD, Weber DJ. Antimicrobial activity of home disinfectants and natural products against potential human pathogens. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000 Jan;21(1):33-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10656352

    Centers For Disease Control (CDC) Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008 http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/Disinfection_Sterilization/toc.html

    CiJane S. Greatorex, Rosanna F. Page, Martin D. Curran, Paul Digard, Joanne E. Enstone, Tim Wreghitt, Penny P. Powell, Darren W. Sexton, Robtation Cortesia C, Vilchèze C, Bernut A, Contreras W, Gómez K, de Waard J, Jacobs WR, Jr, Kremer L, Takiff H. 2014. Acetic acid, the active component of vinegar, is an effective tuberculocidal disinfectant. mBio 5(2):e00013-14. doi:10.1128/mBio.00013-14. http://mbio.asm.org/content/5/2/e00013-14.full

    Effectiveness of Common Household Cleaning Agents in Reducing the Viability of Human Influenza A/H1N1 http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0008987

    World Health Organization: Interim Infection Prevention and Control Guidance for Care of Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Filovirus Haemorrhagic Fever in Health-Care Settings, with Focus on Ebola. September 2014 http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/130596/1/WHO_HIS_SDS_2014.4_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1&ua=1

    CDC Guidelines for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008 http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/disinfection_sterilization/7_0formaldehyde.html

    Brady MJ1, Lisay CM, Yurkovetskiy AV, Sawan SP. Persistent silver disinfectant for the environmental control of pathogenic bacteria. Am J Infect Control. 2003 Jun;31(4):208-14. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12806357

  • Keep Your Kids Safe From The “Mystery Virus”

    By Nurse Mark

     

    It’s like something out of a science fiction horror movie; scenes out of every parent or grandparent’s worst nightmares. An illness that seems to strike only children. Immunization status makes no difference to it; it doesn’t seem to matter if kids have been given every possible vaccination. Antibiotics are useless; it’s a virus, and so it laughs at mere antibiotics. There is no known antiviral treatment available to conventional doctors. There is no protective vaccine.

    It has struck down children in a dozen states so far and appears to be spreading – though the government is being tight-lipped about it, no doubt hoping to prevent panic. It has sickened a thousand or more children so far, and of those, nearly a third have been sick enough to spend time in the intensive care unit of the hospital.

    Fortunately, none have died – yet.

    The headlines are screaming about ‘mystery virus” but it’s really not a mystery. It is an enterovirus called EV-D68 that has been around since the 1960’s. It used to be that it caused a relatively minor cold or “stomach flu” that your probably caused mother and mine to keep us home from school with for a day or two but that was otherwise annoying but relatively harmless.

    All that has now changed – it is making kids very, very sick.

    Why has this once relatively benign virus suddenly turned potentially deadly? Who knows. Perhaps it has mutated. Perhaps in our obsession to live sterile, and pathogen-free in every way we have lost our ability to deal with it. In the end, to use Hillary Clinton’s words, “What difference, at this point, does it make?”

    Well, to the kids affected, or who might become infected, it is a big deal – and while it may not make any difference to someone sickened with EV-D68 just how this virus managed to get so virulent and nasty, it does make a difference that modern conventional medicine seems quite powerless to do much of anything about it.

    Their best advice so far is frequent hand-washing and avoiding people who are obviously sick. Oh, and there’s always the intensive care unit for the unlucky third of kids who get hit hard… But there are no drugs, no magic, miraculous, heroic Big Pharma salvation.

    So, what is a parent to do? Hide your kids at home until it all goes away? Send them off to school and be worried sick that they’ll be the next victim to end up in an ICU bed? Make them wear a mask and gloves in public? (Yeah, right – like that’s going to happen!)

    Natural medicine doesn’t have a magical, miraculous cure either – sorry to disappoint you.

    But we do have some suggestions that can help equip kids to better resist this nasty virus.

    Let’s start by helping your kids to have a strong immune system – that’s pretty easy.

    We’ll start with sleep: kids need a solid 8 to 12 hours of quality sleep – no lights (even night-lights), no beeping smartphones, no violent videogames before bed, just a quiet, dark, comfortable bed in a room with fresh air and no distractions. Figure out what time “get-up time” is in the morning and work back from there to set bedtime. Most kids will grumble and complain bitterly about the “unfairness” of it all, but without that sleep time immune systems become weakened and stressed. Try a little lavender oil – a drop or two on the pillow. It’s an old nurse’s trick to promote relaxation and sleep… For older kids, perhaps Lavella.

    We are what we eat – the ancient wisdom is so true. Your kid probably didn’t get enough sleep, despite your best efforts. Then that same kid is going to climb into a metal tube called a school bus with some 60 or more other kids, and be transported to a school where they will rotate in and out of classrooms where they will sit in close confinement with thirty or so kids… and share a crowded cafeteria at lunchtime and more classroom confinement through the afternoon… until they get back onto that sardine can of a school bus for the ride home. What perfect conditions for the spreading of germs and viruses, right?

    So, why would you allow them to actively suppress their immunity first thing each morning and several times each day?

    Let’s face it – breakfast is probably a big glass of orange juice or other sugary “breakfast drink”, another big glass of milk (skim, of course, which has more sugar than whole milk), and a bowl of sweetened cereal or some sort of toaster pancakes or waffles or even (shudder) Pop Tarts… or the toast and jam: let’s not even go there, OK? Pure carbohydrate, with the added bonus of gluten to mess with those developing minds… (you didn’t read our article Gluten and Casein, The Modern Poisons In Your Diet? Please take a moment to do so now…)

    Enough sugar to shut down a kid’s immune system for hours.

    Then, because all that sugar is going to wear off around mid-morning, leaving the poor kid sleepy and cranky, there will be a snack break for some more “fruit juice” and probably some kind of “energy bar” or maybe a granola bar or pudding cup.

    More immune paralyzing sugar…

    Then the school lunch – usually a high-carb affair with yet more “fruit juice”, skim milk, and sugary fruits.

    And a sugary mid afternoon snack, “for energy”… or worse, a sugary “sports drink” or sugar, chemical and caffeine-filled “energy drink.”

    Remember, each blast of sugar suppresses immunity for up to 3 hours…

    And back onto the school bus for home.

    Why not start the day with a good high-protein, low carb breakfast that will see them through the morning without having to resort to a “granola bar” or worse, a candy bar (which is all that many “granola bars” and “energy bars” really are anyway.) Eggs, meat, cheese, low-carb fruits and vegetables… These will help to preserve immunity and also prevent that mid-morning “crash” that has kids looking for a sugar hit.

    OK, so you don’t have time to prepare an eggs and meat breakfast for anyone – should you just give up and let your kid eat Pop-Tarts or Eggo Waffles?

    How about a quick, delicious, healthy, high-protein, low cab milkshake that you can make in minutes and be sure that your kids will love. Dr. Myatt’s SuperShake is perfect as a meal replacement anytime and is an ideal breakfast choice for busy families.

    Lunch and dinner should be the same – high protein, low-carb, and very, very low on the sugars.

    For an energy drink that you can feel good about, and that your kids will like too, try ZipFizz in a variety of flavors. It adds quickly to bottled water, it’s fizzy, it tastes great, it’s high in electrolytes and vitamins – including B-12 and potassium for energy, and it has zero sugar. And it’s “cool” – kids like it!

    OK, enough about diet already – what else can you do to virus-proof my kids?

    Well, let’s look at one of the government’s recommendations – frequent hand washing. Like that’s going to happen during a busy school day, right? So you send your kid off with some “hand sanitizer” Not a bad idea – except that most of the popular hand sanitizers have some serious problems…

    If you haven’t read our expose on hand sanitizers, please take a moment to do so now:  HealthBeat News: Poisoned With Good Intentions

    Our Silver Gel Hand Sanitizer contains none of the alcohol, perfumes, colors, or pesticide chemicals of most conventional sanitizers, and it is highly effective. Not only that, it’s different, it’s silver, and it might just carry a “cool” factor that could encourage your kids to use it. Oh, and by the way – this stuff is useful against the bane of every teenager, the dreaded zits. A little dab on the nasty spot will help it to heal quicker…

    Colloidal silver has a long and proud history as an antimicrobial effective against most bacteria and viruses. Are we claiming it to be an effective treatment against the enterovirus called EV-D68? No, we can’t. There is no scientific evidence specifically stating that it is effective against this particular virus. That is because nobody has done a scientific, medically valid study. Why is that? It’s because studies like that cost a lot of money, and usually only the ultra-wealthy drug companies can afford them. Since silver cannot be patented there is no profit in it for Big Pharma – so no money for studies.

    But given colloidal silver’s effectiveness against so many other bugs, bacteria, and viruses and silver’s low potential for toxicity, it is well worth having this product in your natural medicine cupboard. Please read more here:  HealthBeat News: Is There A Silver Bullet?

    In addition to the liquid colloidal silver for immune enhancement and for use during infections, there is Colloidal Silver Vertical Spray – intended for use as a “nasal spray” to help support healthy nasal passages and sinuses – where enteroviruses like EV-D68 like to gain a foothold…

    Despite your best efforts, your kids probably don’t get a full, optimal range of essential vitamins, minerals, and trace minerals each day. Why not consider Children’s Vitamins for your younger kiddies, and Dr. Myatt’s Maxi Multi for your young adults? For the “young adults” crowd who might find taking vitamins to school to take at lunchtime to be “uncool” or whose schools might frown upon “unidentified pills” Maxi Multi can also be taken twice daily, at breakfast and dinner, if necessary.

    Dr. Myatt’s Immune Support capsules can also help to fortify young immune systems.

    Adult doses of most things are a bit much for smaller kids, so here is where you can find Dr. Myatt’s dosing guidelines that you can use to calculate appropriate dosing for smaller kids:

    So, there you have some basic ideas for giving your kids a shot at avoiding the “mystery virus”, enterovirus EV-D68 . Big Medicine and Big Pharma are wringing their hands helplessly over this, so it’s up to you!