Author: Wellness Club

  • Three Hidden Causes of Disease Lurking in Your Mouth

    [Nurse Mark note: this article is a reprint of a HealthBeat Newsletter originally published on May 13th 2006 – which can be found here. We feel this important information deserves to be brought forward.]

    By Dr. Dana Myatt 

    I think you’ll be surprised at these hidden causes of disease that are often overlooked in medicine. Read on and learn how to protect yourself…

    Three Hidden Causes of Disease Lurking in Your Mouth

    The cause of numerous health problems— from mild to life-threatening— may be lurking in your mouth if you have ever had any conventional dental work performed. Fillings, root canals and crowns can create a ticking time-bomb for disease elsewhere in the body. Dentistry-caused problems can range from osteoporosis, chronic infections, high blood pressure and arthritis to cardiac irregularities, neurological disorders and even cancer. But don’t expect your conventional dentist to tell you about any of this. In fact, he or she may not even known about these dangers, because the American Dental Association (ADA) denies that these problems exist in spite of vast amounts of evidence.

    The “Root” of the Problem: What’s Wrong with Root Canals

    “Root canals” are a procedure that destroys the tooth’s nerve, thereby allowing a diseased (rotten) tooth to be left in the mouth without causing pain. This procedure also destroys blood supply to the tooth. The dead tooth is supposedly sterilized at the time of the procedure, but in truth it is difficult if not impossible to completely sterilize a tooth because of the complex network of bone matrix (thousands of little nooks and crannies). The dead tooth, left in the mouth with no blood supply to bring immune factors and oxygen in and carry waste out, becomes a haven for bacteria. Root canal infections are rarely recognized because, unlike living teeth which have nerves to give “pain feedback,” root canal teeth are dead. An infection in a root canal tooth has to be incredibly severe to be obvious to most dentists, and patients will rarely feel any pain because the nerve is gone.

    Anaerobic bacteria (a deadly kind of bacteria that thrive without oxygen) take up residence in the dead tooth and from this “safe haven,” shed into the bloodstream where they can infect heart valves, joints or other organs, as well as damage the immune system. Root canals are a HUGE overlooked source of chronic inflammation and infection.

    Toxic Metals in Your Mouth

    Toxic metals are normally found in the body only in minute amounts. These metals include mercury, cadmium, lead, aluminum, antimony, nickel, and tin. When such metals accumulate in the body beyond these tiny levels, they interfere with normal nerve flow and poison organs and tissues. Toxic metals are commonly used in dentistry as components of fillings, crowns and pins (anchors).

    With the exception of plutonium, mercury is more poisonous than any other metal. The safety of mercury-containing dental fillings has been debated by dentists and physicians since the 1800’s, but the “going line” of the American Dental Association (ADA) is that mercury used in amalgam dental fillings is harmless. Unfortunately, a vast amount of scientific evidence contradicts this position. Mercury vapor can be measured in significant quantities from the moment amalgam fillings are placed in the mouth. Mercury is swallowed, inhaled and absorbed directly from the mouth. Other toxic metals found in fillings, crowns and pins can be leached out of place by acidic mouth pH or by galvanic current, the third major “time bomb” in your mouth.

    Galvanic Current: A Surprise Problem with Numerous Consequences

    Toxic metals leaching from fillings and other dental materials are only one hazard of metal-containing dental materials. When two different metals are in close proximity, a phenomenon called “electro galvanism” (electrical current) is created . This current occurs when two or more different metals are present in the mouth, such as when mercury amalgam fillings and cadmium-containing crowns interact. NOTE: to see this phenomenon in action, chew on a piece of aluminum foil. If you have ANY metal in your mouth (fillings, crowns, pins), you will feel the electrical current, and it will be surprisingly painful.

    Electrical currents cause chemical reactions to take place, analogous to electroplating reactions used in jewelry manufacture . Mouth bacteria digest food trapped between teeth and produce acid wastes which contribute to this “battery effect.” The result of having an electrical current in the mouth is two-fold:

    I.) Toxic metal release. Mercury and other metals leach from fillings, crowns, pins, etc. under the influence of galvanic current. These toxic metals liberated from dental work can damage the brain, nervous system, immune system and other organs. (Ever hear of “mad hatters disease”? This type of insanity, caused by mercury poisoning, was prevalent in hat-makers who used to use mercury in hat-making).
    II.) Electrical currents in the mouth. Electrical currents in the mouth can interfere with brain and nervous system function, endocrine gland function and circulation.

    How To Know If Your Mouth Is Making You Sick

    If you suffer from any medical condition for which a cause cannot be found by your conventional doctor, consider that a “hidden” cause may be lurking in your mouth. Symptoms known to be associated with toxic metals, galvanic currents and root canals include: allergies, cancer, chronic fatigue, depression and other mood and psychiatric disorders, endocrine disorders, GI problems, immune suppression, neurological disorders (MS, ALS, neuropathy), osteoporosis, gum disease, reproductive disorders, birth defects, kidney disease, heart disease (especially arrhythmia, electrical dysfunction or bacterial disease), high blood pressure, lung and respiratory problems and skin disease. Because of the nature of electrical currents, it is also likely that many cases of tinnitus may be caused by dental problems.

    The Method for Accurate Diagnosis

    Any doctor or dentist who “doesn’t believe in” any of the above-listed problems won’t offer you sympathy or help. (Remember, these docs and dentists are the ones “spoon fed” by conventional medical propaganda). You need to talk to an holistic physician who can evaluate your case and refer you to a good holistic dentist. More about that in a minute.

    Hair analysis is an accurate, inexpensive screening tool for many heavy metals that occur in dentistry, including mercury, cadmium and nickel. Although unproven for nutritional mineral evaluation, the presence of a toxic metal on hair analysis is known to be accurate and warrants further evaluation for the source of toxicity. The mouth is the most likely source of heavy metal toxicity. Learn more about where to get hair mineral analysis performed here

    Even in the absence of heavy metal toxicity, the galvanic current effect and/or a root canal infection may still be present. To diagnose theses, I use a careful symptom intake, review all other medical records (to make sure the cause of the problem hasn’t been overlooked and NOT coming from the mouth— we call this a “rule out” in medical practice). Next, I request your full-mouth X-rays and, together with your symptoms, history, other medical records and hair analysis, I consult with an holistic dentist on your behalf. This procedure gives me a solid idea about whether or not your mouth is the source of your medical problems. I’m sorry to report that I don’t know many doctors— even holistic ones— who diagnose dental problems this way, but this is the way I am convinced it should be done.

    Beware of “Holistic Dentists”

    Dentists who are aware of the potential for toxic metal poisoning from amalgam fillings are becoming increasingly common. They bill themselves as “holistic dentists” and offer to remove amalgam fillings. DON’T GO THERE until you have all the facts!

    Remember, there is currently no such thing as an holistic dental school (as there are holistic medical schools), so all “holistic dentists” are self-taught. A very few of them may understand all of the above-listed principals, but in my experience, most do not. The majority are only concerned with amalgam filling removal, and even then, their lack of understanding of the galvanic current phenomena means that they cause more harm than good by failing to remove ALL the offending materials at one time. Further, incautious removal can release mercury into the environment – and the patient – potentially making matters worse!.

    In a future installment I’ll explain what to look for in an holistic dentist.

    In the meantime, even if this report has concerned you that your problems could be dentally-related, take heart! In the skilled hands of someone who knows what they are doing for, these “time bombs” in your mouth are correctable.

  • Lithium Orotate – Protect and Renew Brain Cells

    Lithium is a unique but often overlooked mineral with many health uses. It is a natural mineral in the same family as sodium and potassium.Most people are familiar with the lithium salts (carbonate and citrate) used to treat manic-depression (bipolar disorder). This form of lithium is not easily absorbed, so extremely high doses must be used (1200mg of lithium carbonate per dose, for example). At these doses, lithium is highly toxic. The toxic salt forms are available only by prescription. Lithium orotate is 20-times more biologically active than other forms of lithium, and is extremely safe. In orotate form, lithium acts as a mineral supplement that may be beneficial for:

    • protecting and renewing brain cells (1-8, 17)
    • Alzheimer’s prevention and possibly even reversal  (9-16)
    • migraine and cluster headaches (17-20)
    • depression (21-24,30)
    • low white blood cell count (especially after chemotherapy) (25-27)
    • spatial memory improvement (“Where did I park my car?”) (28)
    • alcoholism (29-31)
    • Meniere’s syndrome (17)
    • Improves cognitive impairment in HIV+ patients (32)
       
    • For more information about this important mineral, and to access the many scientific references that support this article, please visit our Lithium Page at www.DoctorMyatt.com

  • What About Soy Milk For Babies?

    It is great to know that people are reading our posts, and we get some interesting questions and comments as a result.

    Gary commented on our soy article to ask: “What about soy milk for babys” ?

     To which we respond:

    Yikes! Soy milk for babies? I don’t think so!

    Neither Dr. Myatt nor I would advocate feeding soy milk to a baby as a substitute for mothers milk for several reasons, all of which were mentioned in the article.

    First, soy is estrogenic. Babies are generally pretty perfectly hormonally balanced little creatures and they are also fragile little creatures; very sensitive to hormonal imbalances in their critical growing time. Would we really want to give a baby something that could alter those delicately balanced hormones?

    Next, soy can be goitrogenic, meaning it can suppress the function of the thyroid gland. As you might imagine, this is definitely not a good thing for adults, and it could be disastrous for a baby – thyroid suppression in a baby is called “Cretinism”!

    Finally, soy is a challenging protein to digest at the very best of times – many adults, with their better-developed digestive systems have trouble digesting it properly and experience gas and diarrhea – in a baby this would be described as “Colic” but it is actually much more serious than that as it can result in malabsorption and serious allergy and even auto-immune problems.

    There is ample evidence in medical literature that the very best nutrition for a baby comes from mothers milk – the kind that comes from mothers breast. Improved brain and intellectual development, and improved immune system function are well-documented in babies fed breast milk over those fed dairy or soy or synthetic products.

    So, what about babies who cannot tolerate dairy (cows milk) based formulas? Certainly there are babies who are “allergic” to cows milk – I remember seeing those poor little souls when I worked as a floor nurse in a pediatric ward. They would come in sick, fussing, gassy, cramping, and miserable with mom complaining that “none of the baby formulas I’ve tried seem to make him happy…” (even though she had not tried the “original formula” – the milk from her own breast!) The poor little tyke would be “diagnosed” as having “a milk allergy” and then put on a soy substitute. Often things would improve briefly, as the tiny gut was no longer being assaulted by proteins that it was not really designed to have to deal with, but then things would go downhill again, as that tiny digestive system rebelled against yet another foreign protein.

    I can hear the question now: “What about goat milk or sheep’s milk?” Well, many babies who are sensitive to the proteins in cows milk are cross-sensitive to the proteins in goat and sheep’s milk. Further, cows milk, goat milk, and sheep’s milk are likely to contain hormones and antibiotics, and most certainly will have been pasteurized which is very destructive to the proteins and natural enzymes of the milk.

    How many kids out there have been unfairly labeled as being “allergic to everything” or “just a sickly kid” or “a failure to thrive” when they could have been healthy, robust little bundles of joy if they had been breast fed?

    Nothing beats Mothers Milk for a baby!

  • Low Stomach Acid And Vitiligo: One Reader “Takes Us To Task”…

    Sometimes our readers will “take us to task” for something we have written; sometimes they even get a little “testy” with us (no, no, say it isn’t so..!)

    This gentleman feels that we have made claims without providing reference to our research – here is his note and my reply to him:

    Ali Says:

    Thank you for very usefull info.I read all above conditions for which you say that these are associated with Low Stomach acid.
    In which you mention vitiligo. this is the first tyme i read the cause of vitiligo. there are many resources on the net regarding causes of such conditions such as:
    http://www.antivitiligo.com
    http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/65881.php
    These and other such sites provided the search base knowledge. you too should provide some of your research regarding your claim.

    Nurse Mark Replies:

    Hi Ali,

    Our regular readers know that when we make claims such as this they are ALWAYS backed up – not just by “research”, but by by solid, scientific, peer-reviewed research published in respected journals. Such is the case here – had you followed the link in the brief blog article above to our previous newsletter article http://www.healthbeatnews.com/GastricAcid.htm and then read through to the bottom you would have seen a header called “References: Roll Over To View”. Our list of references for this article is some 59 citations long, and the reference you are asking about is: 59.) Francis HW. Achlorhydria as an etiological factor in vitiligo, with report of four cases. Nebraska State Med J 1931;16(1):25–6.

    Hope this helps!
    Cheers,
    Nurse Mark

    As Ali will find when he reviews this article fully, we are very diligent in providing solid scientific, peer-reviewed references to anything we state as fact, and even things we state as opinion are backed up by solid science. We are under constant scrutiny by organizations like the FTC and the FDA who would dearly love to be able to accuse us of being “unscientific” – so our best defense is to use research that even they cannot refute or dismiss.

    One of the problems that we see over and over again as we talk with patients and readers is that many people are simply not trained to be able to critically examine “research” to separate the “one-time, basement lab, 3-rat study” from a fully (and properly) funded, scientifically designed, controlled and conducted, double-blind, peer-reviewed study published in a respected journal. That is where we do the “grunt-work” for our patients and readers, sifting through these mountains of often mind-numbing “research” to find the few pearls of material that will be of benefit. Another problem that we see constantly is that many folks consider news articles and sales copy and testimonials to be “research”, or they see that same “one-time, basement lab, 3-rat study” or some study funded and conducted by the same company that just happens to be selling the substance that was “tested” when they search the internet and find it repeated or referred to dozens, even hundreds of times in forums and chat boards, which gives it an air of importance it doesn’t deserve.

    Here is an example: Ali provided me with two links which he says provide “search base knowledge” (and I’m not quite sure what that means…). The first leads to a website that sells a liquid preparation claimed to “cure” vitiligo. Unfortunately, after spending some time going round and round this website, I was unable to find any scientific references or citations of any sort – but maybe I just didn’t see them, right? What I did find were plenty of “before and after” pictures, and page after page after page of glowing “testimonials” that cannot be verified. Well folks, testimonials are nice – but they are not proof and they are not scientific – and to us they fall into the category of “my brother’s mother-in-law’s second cousin’s first husband took that every day ’till he died, and it really worked for him” sort of “proof of effectiveness” – nice, but nothing that we would want to make a medical recommendation based on! Testimonials are not research – they are a sales technique intended to build trust.

    Next there is the problem of the “news-articles-as-reference”: Ali provides a second link that leads to a news article that describes research into a possible genetic component for vitiligo and other auto-immune conditions. While interesting, and referring to scholarly research conducted by some respected scientists, there are a couple of problems with this article from our standpoint. First, while this is fine, cutting edge research, it has little practical application – rather like the wonderful photographs from Mars; fascinating and pretty, but with little practical application to you and me. Next, this research offers no treatment, just a hope of future miracles.  The most telling quote in the news article is this: “…This finding may also open up new approaches to treatment, possibly for many different autoimmune diseases.” says the lead researcher. This translates roughly to: “This is something that we hope will interest the Big Pharmaceutical Companies enough that they will want to pay us to do more research in the hope of developing profitable new drugs and treatments…” News articles are interesting information that sometimes lead us to scientific research and references, but they are not what we would consider to be a scientific citation on their own.

    So, Ali, thanks for the interesting links, but I find nothing in either of them that would constitute a scientific reference the likes of which can be found at the end of the article http://www.healthbeatnews.com/GastricAcid.htm where the snippet about vitiligo and it’s relationship to low stomach acid was taken.

    HealthBeat News readers can always be sure that they are receiving the hippest, hottest, most up-to-date, most accurate information possible – we sift through the mountains of information, good and bad, to give you the pearls. That’s our job, and we love it!
     

  • Saturated Fats: Another Big Fat Lie

    by Mark Ziemann, R.N.

    "For every complicated problem there is a solution that is simple, direct, understandable, and wrong." — H.L. Mencken

    "Everybody knows" that saturated fats are unhealthy, just like "everybody knew" once upon a time that the earth was flat. The saturated fat myth has seriously compromised the heart-health of Americans, and it’s all based on a Big Fat Lie. Here’s how this fairy tale came to be….

    How Bad Science (Urban Health Legends) Get Started

    Once upon a time, not so very long ago in a place called Nebraska (where the corn grows as high as an elephant’s eye) there lived a handsome young man who was very wealthy and powerful and kept himself very fit. This young man worked hard making millions of dollars in the construction industry and he loved to eat hamburgers. Though he was a very happy young man with a fine family and a successful business, all was not well. One day the young man became very sick. He suffered a heart attack, and almost died.

    The young man’s doctors were very skilled and they saved the his life, but this turn of events frightened the young man very much and he set out to discover why such a dreadful thing happened to him. He found out that his blood cholesterol was high and his doctors told him that this was the cause of his heart attack. Without questioning whether this was true or not, the young man made up his mind to ensure that this would never happen again. He quickly set out to learn as much as he could about heart disease and cholesterol, and quickly decided that the foods he was eating were to blame for his troubles. You see, the experts at that time believed that certain kinds of fats called saturated fats would cause high blood cholesterol and dangerous buildups of a substance called plaque in peoples blood vessels. The young man listened carefully to these "experts," and being a fine young man who wished to help others avoid the troubles that he had experienced, he decided that he would do everything in his power to make sure that saturated fats never ever harmed anyone again.

    The young man wrote many letters and spent much of his own money to take out big newspaper ads telling people how they were being poisoned by saturated fats. He made a lot of people believe in the same things that he believed – that is, that saturated fats were bad and would make them sick and had no place in a healthy diet. The young man’s efforts were quite successful and many big companies were forced to change the way they cooked their foods. They stopped using the saturated fats, and began to use fats that were created especially for them by big industries in big factories. They said that these fats were healthier, and the young man was pleased.

    The young man became very popular, and dedicated the rest of his life to his mission of spreading the word about "bad saturated fats" and cholesterol to all who would listen. He didn’t live happily ever after, but he did live a long life, and became known as "America’s Number One Cholesterol Fighter" before he became sick with heart failure and passed away just a few years ago.

    While this sounds like a fairy tale, it really isn’t. Philip Sokolof was a handsome and wealthy young man who suffered a heart attack that was blamed on high cholesterol and who dedicated himself and his millions to becoming a self-described "amateur cardiologist" and championing the cause of removing the saturated fats that he believed caused elevated blood cholesterol levels from the American diet. While his intentions were good, his science was shaky (he was a high school graduate, not a biochemist or a doctor – much less a cardiologist) and his misguided campaign resulted in the replacement of stable, healthy saturated fats with artificially created trans fatty acids that we now know as extremely dangerous "trans fats."

    Big Business (Can You Say "Proctor and Gamble"?) Helps Promote the Sat Fat Myth

    While Sokolof was largely responsible for the vilification of saturated fats in America, he was not alone. The campaign against saturated fats actually began many years earlier, and Sokolof’s efforts were going on at the same time as the efforts from other political organizations were gathering momentum. A few years prior to Sokolof’s efforts, in 1986, the American Soybean Association began a campaign protesting the importation of competing palm and coconut oils. Two years later the "watchdog" organization, the Center for Science in the Public Interest, took up the cry against saturated fats with the publication of a booklet that was later found to contain mistakes, errors of biochemistry, and erroneous statements about the fat composition of foods. This concerted campaign against saturated tropical oils paid off, and " fats" have been considered poison ever since by mainstream medicine and nutrition "experts."

    To discover why saturated fats have been given such a bad rap we need to go a little further back into history – perhaps as far back as the riverboat days of Mark Twain, but at least to the Second World War, when Japanese forces occupied much of the south Pacific and supplies of most of the tropical oils in the US were cut off for a number of years. Americans turned to home-grown substitutes: polyunsaturated oils such as corn, peanut, cottonseed, and a product of the aforementioned American Soybean Association, soy oil. As the use of these oils grew the growers and industries involved in their production became more powerful and eager to protect their market at any cost.

    At this same time, in the early 1950’s, America began to notice a sharp increase in rates of cardiovascular disease and researchers were looking for answers. A study conducted by a Russian researcher found that rabbits, fed with animal fats (cholesterol) added to their feed developed fatty deposits in their skin and other tissues, including their blood vessels. (I’ll bet those normally vegetarian bunnies wondered what they were being fed!) Another sensational study relied on autopsies of American soldiers that had died in the Korean conflict and found that many of those examined had buildups of arterial plaque – atherosclerosis. (Which surely couldn’t have had anything to do with the military diet of the day, right? Or with the popularity of cigarette smoking?) This study, which made major news at the time, overshadowed other studies of the period which showed similar degrees of atherosclerosis in populations which had less mortality from heart disease despite high fat and high meat diets, or that ate far more vegetarian diets and suffered similar degrees of atherosclerosis, and generally indicated that the thickening of the arterial walls is a natural and unavoidable process. The press took the headline-grabbing autopsy results and ran with them using their usual logic of "the rooster crows every morning, and then the sun rises: therefore, the crowing of the rooster is what makes sunrise happen!"

    During the 1960’s the attack on saturated fats continued with unabated vigor: despite scientific studies showing a decided lack of benefits companies such as Mazola and Proctor and Gamble promoted their vegetable oil creations as being especially healthy, and medical journals of the day promoted Fleischman’s unsalted margarine as being especially good for patients with high blood pressure. The American Medical Association was initially skeptical of all this hype but after the American Heart Association published its dietary guidelines damning animal fats a
    nd praising vegetable oils the AMA quickly fell into line. In 1966 a little self-help book called "Your Heart Has Nine Lives" advocated the substitution of vegetable oils for butter and other so-called "artery clogging" saturated fats. This book was sponsored by makers of Mazola Corn Oil and Mazola Margarine – no surprise – and was widely and freely circulated.

    And that brings us to the handsome young man with his clogged arteries. Despite volumes of evidence to the contrary, saturated fats have been the "fall guy" for coronary artery disease since the 1950’s when in fact, as early as 1956 one researcher had suggested that the increasing use of hydrogenated vegetable oils might be the underlying cause of the CAD epidemic. Unwilling to stand idly by and let profits be imperiled by such things as health or humanitarian concerns, the massive and powerful edible oil industry in the United States has obfuscated, bullied, manipulated, and outright lied to protect it’s burgeoning market share. Supporting the flawed science of Philip Sokolof and pressuring legislators to adopt the anti-saturated fat / tropical oils legislation that he promoted was just good business.

    Setting the Record Straight about Sat Fats

    So, just what are these so-called saturated fats, where do they come from, and what are they used for? Well, the answers to these questions might be a surprise – sat fats are not what we have been led to believe. The most exact answers to the question "what is a saturated fat?" require some tedious and complicated science, and there are varying degrees of saturation. It is easier to simply think of the properties of "hardness" of fats.

    A fat that is fully "saturated" would be as hard as wax, and quite indigestible. Fats that are almost totally "unsaturated" are very liquid, easily absorbed, and not at all common in the natural food supply. This "hardness" of fats is also dependant upon temperature. Many fats are liquid when warm, and solid when cold. Butter, for example, is quite hard when refrigerated, but soft at room temperature. Animal fats such as beef fat, lard, or chicken fat, while usually called "saturated fats" are actually not so: they are mixtures of naturally occurring fats and are actually less than half "saturated." So-called "saturated fats" include things such as cocoa butter, dairy fats (milk fats and butter for example), palm oil, and tallow. Even breast milk is high in saturated fats! Monounsaturated fats include most animal fats, olive oil, canola oil, and peanut oil. Polyunsaturated fats include corn, cotton, and soybean oils, borage and primrose oil, flax seed oil, and fish oil.

    Then there are the "modified" oils: oils that have been altered through a process called "hydrogenation" to make them more useful for certain applications. Margarine is a perfect example of hydrogenation: liquid oil such as cottonseed oil or corn oil, something that humans would never eat in nature, is altered to make it more solid and hard at room temperature. Crisco is another example – the name stands for CRyStalized Cottonseed Oil. The degree of hydrogenation is varied according to the desired use of the oil. Heavily hydrogenated oils might become stick margarine, while less hydrogenated or "partially hydrogenated" oils would become "spreads" or other "food products."

    Then there are the "trans fats" that have been in the news lately. These are fats that have had their molecular geometry altered, either on purpose or accidentally, and they are with very few and minor exceptions, not found in nature. Trans fats, when eaten by humans, tend to have some very bad effects on our bodies as they enter our cells and change how the cell walls function. Effects of trans fats in humans (and animals too) range from unfavorable changes in cholesterol levels to causing blood to become more "sticky", to reduced ability to utilize insulin and increased blood sugar levels and increased weight, to alterations in hormone balances, and more. Trans fats are really only a very small step away from polyunsaturated fats – many polyunsaturated fats can be turned "trans" simply by heating them too much in cooking!

    So, what does all this mean in more practical terms? It means that we must choose our fats carefully, and use them wisely. It means that we must cautiously weigh the claimed benefits of the vegetable-based hydrogenated "designer fats" that are so very commonplace in our modern "fast foods / prepared foods" diet against the known benefits of those traditional and natural fats that have been a part of mankind’s diet for millions of years.

    We humans have evolved over the millennia as creatures that are well-adapted to, and in fact require, animal fats and proteins in our diets for optimal health – the claims of the vegetarian and vegan folks notwithstanding. Indeed, our very first meal, at our mother’s breast, supplied us with a high energy drink that gave our tiny bodies the cholesterol needed for development, and a special fat called Lauric Acid. This Lauric Acid, which is also found in the now-vilified tropical oils coconut oil and palm kernel oil has very strong antifungal and antibacterial properties and helps our tiny infant bodies develop strong immune systems. We are very well equipped to utilize fatty acids in the form of saturated fats such as dairy fats, and monounsaturated fats such as animal fats and olive oil. It is only with the advent of modern industrial processes that polyunsaturated fats such as corn and soybean oils have been available for our consumption – though fish oils (a form of polyunsaturated animal fat) have historically been considered to be healthy.

    Why You Should Eat Butter and Lard

    Butter, as another example, has a far healthier composition as a saturated fat than the synthesized creations that are the various margarines. Being a combination of saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fats it is not as "stable" as margarine – that is, it will turn rancid (a form of turning "trans") if not refrigerated. But then, who would eat rancid butter? It also contains a variety of health-giving vitamins, minerals, and other nutrients.

    Does anyone remember the jar of bacon grease that was a fixture in every kitchen before the days of "spray-on" cooking oils, non-stick fry pans and fat-phobia? My mother carefully saved the grease from the morning bacon, and it was used to cook all sorts of wonderful things, from our morning eggs to delectable entrees and even desserts. We keep a jar of bacon grease in our own kitchen – it is far healthier than the canola oil and soy lecithin and "propellants" (your guess?) that are in our can of "no stick cooking spray."

    Then there is our obsession with "vegetable oils" as found in the aforementioned Crisco shortening. It is interesting to note that Proctor and Gamble, perhaps seeing the writing on the wall, or perhaps in a belated fit of conscience, has sold off the Crisco name and product. This "all vegetable oil" creation, once made from cottonseed oil, is now made from canola oil which must be hydrogenated (as was the cottonseed oil) to make it semi-solid. Smuckers, the new owners of Crisco, claims "Our entire line of Crisco Shortening products have been reformulated to contain zero grams trans fat per serving". Can anyone reading this remember the days when lard was used? All-natural, no-trans-fat lard that made such wonderfully fluffy pastries and flaky pie crusts? Do we really think that humans are well-equipped to consume the kinds of oils that require bushels of rape seed
    or corn or soybeans per gallon to produce? Any more than we might be equipped to consume petroleum oils – no matter how they are "modified"?

    Just like our handsome young man who made it his life’s mission to vilify healthful fats, we live in a fairy-tale world where we are led to believe that with a little help from chemistry and science we can fool mother nature into allowing us to consume "food products" that our bodies were never intended to have to deal with. Unfortunately, life in that fairy tale world is having very real and very serious consequences for Americans and people around the world who are buying into the anti-sat-fat fantasy being promoted by the vegetable oils industry. We are gambling our health and our lives and our future on a grand industrial experiment, and it is paying off with increasing rates of heart disease, cancer, diabetes, obesity, and more.

    At the beginning of the last century, most of the fats in our forefathers diet were either saturated or monounsaturated, mostly from butter, lard, tallow, coconut oil and small amounts of olive oil. Today most of the fats in our diet are polyunsaturated from vegetable oils mostly from soy, as well as from corn, safflower and canola. Before 1920 coronary heart disease was a rarity in America, causing no more than 10% of all deaths. Today heart disease accounts for at least 40% of all deaths. Is there a connection? We believe there is, and a growing body of scientists, researchers, and health care professionals is beginning to stand up to the politically correct diet dogma that is dictating low fat diets and vegetable fats instead of animal or tropical fats. For a historically interesting end to this article we go back to 1956 when Dr. Dudley White, in a television interview, noted that heart disease in the form of myocardial infarction (heart attack) was almost nonexistent in 1900 when egg consumption was three times what it was in 1956 and when corn oil was unavailable. When pressed to support the low-fat, vegetable oil based "Prudent Diet", Dr. White replied: "See here, I began my practice as a cardiologist in 1921 and I never saw an MI patent until 1928. Back in the MI free days before 1920, the fats were butter and lard and I think that we would all benefit from the kind of diet that we had at a time when no one had ever heard the word corn oil."

    Former surgeon general Dr. C. Everett Koop even said, during congressional hearings in 1988: "the coconut scare is foolishness. . . To get the word to commercial interests terrorizing the public about nothing is another matter." Could it be that it is time to turn away from the dangerous designer oils and fats of Big Industry and return to the animal and tropical fats that served our ancestors so well? We think it is!

    Finally, let’s look briefly at this current medical fad that demands that we reduce cholesterol levels in our bloodstream to the lowest possible levels. Remember, cholesterol is essential to life; so essential that your liver will make it "de novo" – from new – if your body senses that it doesn’t have enough of this precious material. Even conventional medicine, in the form of The Framingham Report – the oldest, longest, and biggest study into heart disease in history – determined that when total serum cholesterol is reduced below 160 the risk of heart disease actually increases. Even more interestingly, the Director of The Framingham Study, Dr. William Castelli said in the July 1992 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine "At Framingham, we found that the people who ate the most saturated fat, the most cholesterol and the most calories weighed the least, were more physically active and had the lowest serum cholesterol levels." We can only imagine the dismay that this information must have cause for Philip Sokolof; he must have been aware of it as it was published over a decade before his death. Nevertheless, Sokolof persisted in his efforts to vilify saturated fats and remove cholesterol from the American diet and we can only guess as to why he would continue these efforts in the face of research showing them to be wrong, even harmful. Was he simply too stubborn to accept the facts that proved him wrong, or was he too fully caught up in the whirlwind of Big Politics, Big Industry, Big Agriculture, and Big Pharmacy to be able to change? We’ll never know…

    References
    1.) Sokolof article http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/11/26/health/main585849.shtml
    2.) Sokolof death http://www.blogofdeath.com/archives/000902.html
    3.) D Groom, �Population Studies of Atherosclerosis,� Annals of Int Med , July 1961, 55:1:51-62; W F Enos, et al, �Pathogenesis of Coronary Disease in American Soldiers Killed in Korea,� JAMA , 1955, 158:912
    4.) "Hydrogenated vegetable oils might be the underlying cause of the CAD epidemic"
    A Keys, �Diet and Development of Coronary Heart Disease,� J Chron Dis, Oct 1956, 4(4):364-380
    5.) Excerpt from "The Coconut Diet: The Secret Ingredient That Helps You Lose Weight While You Eat Your Favorite Foods" by Cherie Calbom http://www.enotalone.com/article/3242.html
    6.) http://easydiagnosis.com/articles/oiling.html "The Oiling of America" by Enig and Fallon – many rerferences following this 4 part series.
    7.) http://www.westonaprice.org/knowyourfats/skinny.html#lipid
    The Weston A Price Society Enig & Fallon article "The Skinny on Fats"
    8.) Framingham Study reports re: total cholesterol <160:
    "There is a direct association between falling cholesterol levels over the first 14 years and mortality over the following 18 years" (11% overall and 14% CVD death rate increase per 1 mg/dL per year drop in cholesterol levels). Anderson KM JAMA 1987
    9.) The Honolulu Heart Study:
    �Our data accord with previous findings of increased mortality in elderly people with low serum cholesterol, and show that long-term persistence of low cholesterol concentration actually increases the risk of death. Thus, the earlier that patients start to have lower cholesterol concentrations, the greater the risk of death.� Lancet Aug 2001.