Category: Opinion

  • Dr Myatt in Car Crash: Lesson Learned

    By Dr. Myatt

     

    Hi Folks:

    Well, that was more excitement than I bargained for when I took a friend to lunch. I’m alright, thanks for asking, but the car was totaled.

    We took Cindy’s Volkswagen Jetta because she "just loves this car" and wanted me to ride in it. Nice car. Nice lunch.

    On the way home, as we slowed to make a right turn, we heard a loud "pop" and the car stopped moving. "What happened?" she asked me. "We just got hit" I diagnosed.

    Sure enough, a big delivery truck had rear-ended her lovely little car. Our seatbelts and the car both worked well to protect us and we did not seem to have any injuries. I say "seem" because "whiplash," a strain-sprain of the back and neck muscles, and MTBI — mild traumatic brain injury— can occur in such accidents even when people appear to be OK.

    The vehicle that hit us was a "box truck," a good-sized delivery vehicle – perhaps a 1-ton truck.

    It’s front grill was 16 feet behind the wreck, so it had pushed us some distance when it hit. Everything happened so fast, I didn’t realized we were pushed.

    The Jetta’s trunk was crushed into the back seat, the back window shattered.

    My friend and I, and the young man who hit us, were all able to get out of the vehicles. No one was bleeding, no broken bones.

    The traffic was light when we were hit. We were doing about 15 miles per hour and the lane we were in was clear when we pulled into it. I don’t know where the truck came from.

    I asked the driver what he was doing that he hadn’t seen us. "I dunno; I was looking down and when I looked up…"

    Ahh. "DWI"Driving While Inattentive. Probably texting or messing with a cell phone is my guess. Cell phone use is a more common cause of vehicle accidents today than drunk driving. And since more people yak on a cell phone while driving than drive while drunk, cell phone use represents a major cause of motor vehicle accidents.

    So, Cindy is getting a new car; another Jetta I’m betting. That little car did just what it was supposed to do -  it gave it’s life to protect us. But every good story has a moral, and here’s mine with a bonus extra.

    One: Always wear your seat belt. We likely would have sustained serious injury being impacted that hard without our belts.

    Two: HANG UP AND DRIVE – the life you save might be your own! (or mine)

    On that note, please watch this brief but important "crash" experiment.

     

    References

    Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., and Crouch, D. L. A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2006 (Summer), 381-391; University of Utah.

    Pickrell, T. M. (2014, February). Driver Electronic Device Use in 2012. (Traffic Safety Facts Research Note. Report No. DOT HS 811 884). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

  • Insurance: Friend Or Foe?

    By Nurse Mark

     

    Many readers may know that I am a private pilot. I was at the airport the other day chatting with some other pilots about the subject of drugs and drug testing when one fellow (a commercial pilot) observed:

    The problem is that pilots are human, and subject to all the normal problems everyone else goes through. When a pilot gets depressed, they cannot seek help, or they could be grounded for a period that can last for years.

    Why is it OK for police, judges, firemen, doctors, and other jobs with great responsibility to be successfully treated with anti-depressants, but pilots are expected to be superhuman physically and mentally?

    He is quite right – it is really NOT ok for there to be such a double-standard.

    On the other hand, no one is functioning at their best when taking side-effect producing pharmaceuticals.

    In the case of pilots the FAA has the oversight and the clout to do something about it and as a result the list of drugs that pilots are allowed to use while flying is very small. Most other professions do not, and so you find judges making bad decisions that affect peoples lives, cops who put themselves, their partners, and the public at risk with dulled (or hyped-up) reflexes, crane operators making bad decisions with drug-dulled judgment, and so on.

    It is worth remembering however that depression is not caused by a Zoloft or Paxil or Effexor deficiency, anxiety is not caused by a Valium or Xanax deficiency, high blood pressure is not caused by a Beta Blocker deficiency, diabetes is not caused by any drug deficiency… and yet these are common problems that people use judgment and reaction-time dulling drugs for.

    Maybe you can get this stuff "covered" by some health care plan, and maybe it doesn’t affect your employability, and maybe you really don’t care that you are disabled to some degree by side effects… lots of people don’t really care, just as long as their insurance “covers” it.

    But if you’re a pilot, it’s a big concern. Allopathic (conventional) treatment for many illnesses uses conventional drugs that will ground a pilot, resulting in a sudden and severe loss of income – no wonder many attempt to hide their problems. While hypertension or arrhythmias or diabetes will probably be found out on the FAA physical, depression can be hidden with varying degrees of success.

    But it doesn’t need to be that way. Given the financial incentive for a pilot to maintain the ability to fly, it’s worth stepping outside of the "corporate medical insurance plan" box to investigate alternative, non-conventional health care.

    A visit with a naturopathic physician, while still reportable to the FAA, could be legitimately reported simply as "Nutritional and Dietary Counseling" even though the desired effect of that counseling might be to correct imbalances that may be causing, say, neurotransmitter imbalances and resulting feelings of depression. Result: reporting legitimately accomplished and privacy maintained.

    A good Naturopathic Medical Doctor would perform neurotransmitter testing and make dietary and supplement changes to correct out-of-range neurotransmitters, without using reportable drugs. This is not fantasy or psychic woo-woo stuff – we do it successfully, every day here. Though Dr. Myatt is licensed to prescribe drugs she very rarely does – it just isn’t necessary. Drugs are more like Band-Aids – they treat the symptoms not the cause.

    Why not treat the cause? Doing that usually gets much faster and more complete healing than just covering up the symptoms with a drug.

    As a “bonus,” dietary supplements like L-5HTP, SAMe, St. Johns Wort, bromelain, grape seed extract, niacin, etc. are NOT reportable to the FAA or anyone else as "drugs"…

    We are constantly amazed at the medical "problems" that folks drug themselves for that can be corrected without drugs.

    Some examples:

    • Hypertension – easily correctable without drugs,
    • Type 2 diabetes – not just correctable but cured without drugs,
    • Allergies – yep, drugless relief – that means no drowsy-making pills, and probably little or no return of symptoms next season too…
    • High cholesterol – back to healthy ranges without drugs,
    • GERD – a "slam-dunk" drugless cure with no “little purple pill” required,
    • Heart arrhythmias – most respond very nicely to drugless treatment.
      (True Story: We have a lawyer patient who was told after 3 successive EKG’s that he had a permanent and irreversible heart block – and that he was "a ticking time-bomb" who would likely need a pacemaker. After a month of drugless treatment his cardiologist repeated the EKG and shook his head in disbelief saying "If I were a lawyer I would not want to have to go into court to explain this – it’s gone and your heart is fine – and that isn’t supposed to happen!")

    The list goes on and no, but you get the idea – mankind has survived and thrived for millennia without the help of modern drugs – what the heck has changed so in the last century to make us any different?

    It amazes me that folks insure their automobile and don’t expect the insurance company to pay for their tune-ups, oil changes, new tires, or new muffler – but when you suggest to someone that they might part with a few of their hard-earned dollars for a health care consultation or vitamins or supplements they react with horror, expecting that to be "covered by the plan" or they just won’t do it. They maintain their cars better than they do their own bodies…

    It would be like knowingly driving your car on a bald tire, waiting for it to blow out on the road so that you can call road service to come out and put the spare on… and still not bothering to get new tires "because insurance won’t cover it."

    “Well who cares,” you say – “I’m not a pilot, and I don’t worry about the FAA.”

    For everyone there is increasingly a privacy issue: more and more often we hear reports of HMO’s and insurance companies tracking health care usage and even day to day purchases with an eye to “adjusting” premiums or requiring “lifestyle changes.” You bought a candy bar in the checkout line at the grocery store? You might get a call from your insurer suggesting dietary counseling… Do you smoke? Even just an occasional cigar? Brace yourself for higher premiums. Did you mention some recent stress, insomnia, or blue feelings to your doc? Remember, all your medical records are on-line and accessible to your “insurance provider” (and who-knows-who-else) now… And all your prescriptions? There they are, “in the cloud” for all the world to see…

    Or maybe you are a top executive in a company with nervous shareholders – or an employee in a company with a HMO that tells HR who is healthy and who is a “drag” on the company’s health plan…

    So, if you have aviation buddies who are dancing around the FAA trying to avoid reporting ground-able stuff have them call us – I’ll bet we can help keep ‘em flying… and healthier than they’ve ever been… And for anyone else who wants to keep their health and their privacy, well, we can help you too.

    No, your “insurance” is not your friend – good health, achieved without drugs, is.

  • Because You’ll Be Voting Soon…

    From Dr. Myatt and Nurse Mark

     

    This little joke, or perhaps parable, came to us courtesy of an anonymous reader:

     

    HEAVEN AND HELL

    While walking down the street one day a rather corrupt Senator was tragically hit by a car and died.

    In due course his soul arrived in heaven and was met by St. Peter at the entrance.

    "Welcome to heaven," said St. Peter. "Before you settle in, it seems there is a problem. We seldom see a high official around these parts, you see, so we’re not sure what to do with you."

    "No problem, just let me in," said the Senator.

    "Well, I’d like to, but I have orders from the higher ups. What we’ll do is have you spend one day in hell and one in heaven. Then you can choose where to spend eternity.”

    "Really? I’ve made up my mind. I want to be in heaven," said the Senator.

    "I’m sorry, but we have our rules." And with that, St. Peter escorted him to the elevator and down he went;

    Down, down, down to hell.

    The doors opened and he found himself in the middle of a lush green golf course. In the distance was an opulent clubhouse and standing in front of it were all his friends and other politicians who had worked with him.

    Everyone was very happy and wearing evening dress. They ran to greet him, shake his hand, and reminisce about the good times they had while getting rich at the expense of the people – the voters.

    They played a friendly game of golf and then feasted on lobster, caviar and the finest champagne.

    Also present was the devil, who really was a very friendly guy who was having a good time dancing and telling jokes.

    They were all having such a good time that before the Senator realized it, it was time to go.

    Everyone gave him a hearty farewell and waved goodbye while he boarded the elevator.

    The elevator went up, up, up and the door reopened in heaven where St. Peter was waiting for him; "Now it’s time to visit heaven…”

    So the Senator joined a group of contented souls moving from cloud to cloud, playing harps, singing melodiously and eating sparingly of tasty but simple, satisfying and healthy foods. They all had a pleasant time and, before he realized it, the 24 hours had gone by and St. Peter returned.

    "Well, then, you’ve spent a day in hell and another in heaven. Now you must choose your eternity."

    The Senator reflected for a minute, then he answered: "Well, I would never have said it before, I mean heaven has been delightful, but I think I would be better off in hell."

    So St. Peter escorted him to the elevator and he back he went; down, down, down to hell…

    When the doors of the elevator opened he found himself in the middle of a sulfurous, scorched, barren land covered with waste and garbage. He saw all his friends, now dressed in rags, picking up the trash and putting it in black bags as more trash fell on them endlessly from above.

    The devil came over to him and put his arm around his shoulders.

    " I… I don’t understand," stammered the Senator. "Yesterday I was here and there was a golf course and clubhouse, and we ate lobster and caviar, drank champagne, and danced and had a grand time. Now there’s just a wasteland full of garbage and my friends look miserable. What happened?"

    The devil smiled at him and said "Yesterday we were campaigning, Today, you voted..”

    Vote wisely in November 2014.

  • Your FDA – Protecting You From… Yourself ?

    “I’m from the government and I’m here to help”

    By Nurse Mark

     

    It was the late president Ronald Regan who famously said: "The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’"

    It seems that the FDA has seen fit to “help” us some more and as a result a safe and useful treatment for chelating poisonous substances from the body is no longer freely available “over-the-counter” as it once was.

    Dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) has a long history of safe and effective use as a chelating agent for heavy metals since it was first synthesized for that purpose. In 1957 Chinese researchers found it to be effective in chelating antimony, and in 1962 it was shown highly effective in treating arsenic and mercury poisoning. It is currently “indicated” (that means that conventional doctors are told that it is correct to use) in cases of lead poisoning.

    It is water soluble and widely considered to be non-toxic.

    So, why is this useful, non-toxic substance no longer available? Because it’s a drug!

    Let me explain: DMSA has been freely available for purchase since it was first synthesized. We have stocked it here at The Wellness Club for as long as I can remember. It has never been a “big seller” since not many people need to chelate out heavy metals from their bodies, but we have kept it on hand as a service for the few people who do find themselves in a pickle and need to use this specialized supplement.

    That, however, has now come to an end.

    Why? Well, it seems that there is a prescription drug available called Chemet manufactured by Kremers Urban Pharmaceuticals Inc. in Seymour, Indiana.

    Because there is this FDA “approved” prescription drug available, even though it is nothing more than the DMSA that has been readily available without a prescription for all these years, the non-prescription DMSA is now illegal to sell. It is now considered to be an “unapproved drug.” How do you like that logic?

    How do things like this happen? Well, it seems that if a pharmaceutical company can pony up enough cash to afford all the “fees” that must be paid to the FDA they can have almost anything declared a “drug” and “FDA Approved.” Once that happens the FDA then bans the sale of anything similar that is not “Approved.” Essentially, by coming up with millions of dollars in “fees” to the FDA a drug company can buy a monopoly on a substance – like DMSA.

    Under different circumstances this might be called a “protection racket.” But when it’s done by the FDA it is called “protecting the public interest.”

    Go figure.

    The FDA: Your tax dollars, hard at work – protecting you from such things as Bextra, Acomplia, Vioxx…

    Oh, wait… Sorry – those were “Approved” drugs, weren’t they!

    Well, we’ll just have to be satisfied to be “protected” from the evil non-prescription version of DMSA.

    Say… I have an idea: I’m going to see if I can get sodium chloride approved as a drug for use in the treatment of hyponatremia (low sodium). When that happens, table salt will become an “Unapproved Drug” and I’ll be the only one allowed to sell it – as a prescription drug of course…  Who wants to invest with me? A few millions of dollars in “approval fees” and we’ll be rich!

  • Headlines Scream: New Risks For Niacin!

    By Nurse Mark

     

    Will the assault on vitamins, minerals, and other natural and non-patentable (and thus non-profitable) supplements and treatments ever stop?

    In my opinion, no. As long as something poses a threat to the profit picture of Big Pharma and their patent drug offerings there will be no let-up in Big Pharma’s efforts to remove the competition.

    Here is a link to one of dozens of equally breathless and poorly researched and written articles from the last few days: Studies see new risks for cholesterol drug niacin

    Pretty scary, huh? Calling niacin a drug, invoking the names of a “famous” cardiologist and both the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology, telling us that just by using this “Drug” niacin "for every 200 people that we treat with niacin, there is one excess death,"…

    It sure sounds like we had better stop using this deadly “drug” immediately!

    Right?

    Not so fast…

    Associate Press (AP) and the reporter who penned this unfortunate scare-piece have done their readers a severe injustice – shame on them for such shoddy journalism!

    While the reporter correctly identifies niacin as a member of the B vitamin family, she promptly goes on to call it a drug, and then compounds her error by insinuating that patent drug forms of niacin-containing drugs offered by the pharmaceutical companies by prescription are no different from the natural forms of simple, unadulterated niacin available over-the-counter in your local health food or vitamin store. Shame on her!

    The drugs referred to in this “study” are Niaspan and Tredaptive. Both these drugs contain niacin – but niacin alone is not a drug – it is a vitamin!

    And bologna contains beef – but it sure isn’t steak!

    Niaspan is a “time release” niacin-containing drug from the drug company Abbvie. It contains it’s niacin in a wax matrix within a film coating that is said to delay absorption (the “time release” part) and it also contains the inactive ingredients hypromellose, povidone, stearic acid, and polyethylene glycol, and the coloring agents FD&C yellow #6/sunset yellow FCF Aluminum Lake, synthetic red and yellow iron oxides, and titanium dioxide.

    Niaspan has been around as a prescription drug for many years and has long been known to carry a risk of liver damage and to occasionally cause increased blood glucose in diabetics.

    Tredaptive is, so to speak, “a whole ‘nother ball-game” and one really has to question why it is even being mentioned. You see, while this fancy prescription drug does indeed contain niacin, it also contains another drug – a drug called Laropiprant which acts as a prostaglandin DP1 antagonist intended to reduce the natural  “flushing” that niacin is infamous for.

    So, why would I say that Tredaptive is “a whole ‘nother ball-game”? Well, because it has never been approved for use in the United States, it has been banned from use in Europe, and in those few countries where it is still available the drug company Merck is suspending sales of it and telling doctors to stop prescribing it!

    Sounds like a bad drug that Merck no longer wants to take a chance on selling – the risks are too great! Remember, Merck, like any drug company is all about risk and reward – aka “profit” – and they have obviously concluded that the profit from this drug will not be enough to offset the payouts when the lawsuits begin…

    Bad Science (aka B.S.), Bad Writing, and an obvious bias toward Big Pharma combine to give you…

    A terrible pseudo-news article intended to frighten you away from a natural vitamin and designed to help lay the groundwork for the FDA’s desired abolition of non-prescription vitamins, minerals and dietary supplements.

    The reporter is actually writing about an editorial (i.E.: “opinion”) article published recently in the New England Journal of Medicine by Dr. Donald Lloyd-Jones of Northwestern University in Chicago. This very same Dr. Donald Lloyd-Jones is a paid grand poohbah with the American Heart Association – an outfit very deeply in the pocket of Big Pharma, and dependant upon Big Pharma for funding…

    Lloyd-Jones, in his “editorial” is actually talking about two studies – one done on Niaspan, which has well-known risks and dangers, and the other on Tredaptive, a drug that was never available in the US and has been banned from use in Europe and withdrawn from the market by the drug company Merck. He is using these “studies” with their to-be-expected negative conclusions, to smear by association a vitamin that has a long and honorable history of safe and effective use in promoting healthy cholesterol levels.

    Yes – Niaspan and Terdaptive can be (are) bad drugs. Yes – both these drugs contain the vitamin niacin. So is niacin the cause of the increased risks mentioned by these studies?

    NO!

    While niacin was “found at the scene of the crime” it is Not Guilty!

    The bottom line?

    Niacin works, and works well. It has a long and honorable history of safe and effective use. I causes many people to experience a harmless but annoying, even embarrassing flush when they take it, so Big Pharma has long seen this as an opportunity to find something, anything about it that they can change and patent.

    But it seems that every time Big Pharma gets their greedy paws on something safe and effective and un-patentable (unprofitable) like niacin they manage to turn it into something toxic like Niaspan or Terdaptive.

    So they are left to print deceitful “news” articles maligning natural remedies and defending and promoting their patent medicines.

    For Shame!

    Learn more about Niacin here:

    Learn more about cholesterol and cholesterol control here:

    Learn why you MUST eat healthy saturated fats and cholesterol here:

    Learn about the dangers of using statin drugs to lower cholesterol here:

    Don’t like that “Niacin Flush” but want something natural to help you achieve healthy cholesterol levels? Try this natural herb with plenty of research behind it:

     

    References:

    Merck withdraws Tredaptive: http://www.mercknewsroom.com/press-release/research-and-development-news/merck-provides-update-next-steps-tredaptive-extended-rel

    Wikipedia discusses niacin: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niacin

    New England Journal of Medicine editorial piece: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe1406410

    Wikipedia discusses disgraced Merck drug Laropiprant: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laropiprant